检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

CACAI: Comparative analysis of crypto apps in India

AIP Conference Proceedings 2023年第1期2916卷

作者： Rahul Johari Anuj Talwar Suhas Harbola Jyotsna Yadav Himesh Nayak Deo Prakash Vidyarthi SWINGER: Security Wireless IoT Network Group of Engineering and Research University School of Information Communication and Technology (USICT) Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Sector-16C Dwarka Delhi India Computer vision and Image processing lab University School of Information Communication and Technology (USICT) Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Sector-16C Dwarka Delhi India School of Computer and Systems Sciences Parallel and Distributed Systems Lab JNU Delhi India

Crypto-currency is a decentralized digital currency which can be used as a medium of exchange. As it does not have any central authority, it is unregulated and a volatile asset. Globally the crypto market is worth a few trillion dollars. The Indian crypto market suffered a lot due to a ban imposed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), an Indian regulatory agency, which lasted for around two years. Even after the ban and cautions issued by the RBI, the crypto market in India touched a billion dollar mark in no time. Currently, the crypto market has more than 10 million Indian investors which is growing fast as the number of exchange apps in the Indian market increase with the ease of trading in crypto. In the current research work Comparative Analysis of Crypto App in India (CACAI) has been performed and results exceed the expectations.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

QUBIQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Biomedical Image Segmentation Challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Li, Hongwei Bran Navarro, Fernando Ezhov, Ivan Bayat, Amirhossein Das, Dhritiman Kofler, Florian Shit, Suprosanna Waldmannstetter, Diana Paetzold, Johannes C. Hu, Xiaobin Wiestler, Benedikt Zimmer, Lucas Amiranashvili, Tamaz Prabhakar, Chinmay Berger, Christoph Weidner, Jonas Alonso-Basanta, Michelle Rashid, Arif Baid, Ujjwal Adel, Wesam Alis, Deniz Baheti, Bhakti Bai, Yingbin Bhat, Ishaan Cetindag, Sabri Can Chen, Wenting Cheng, Li Dutande, Prasad Dular, Lara Elattar, Mustafa A. Feng, Ming Gao, Shengbo Huisman, Henkjan Hu, Weifeng Innani, Shubham Ji, Wei Karimi, Davood Kuijf, Hugo J. Kwak, Jin Tae Le, Hoang Long Li, Xiang Lin, Huiyan Liu, Tongliang Ma, Jun Ma, Kai Ma, Ting Oksuz, Ilkay Holland, Robbie Oliveira, Arlindo L. Pal, Jimut Bahan Pei, Xuan Qiao, Maoying Saha, Anindo Selvan, Raghavendra Shen, Linlin Silva, Joao Lourenco Spiclin, Ziga Talbar, Sanjay Wang, Dadong Wang, Wei Wang, Xiong Wang, Yin Xi, Ruiling Xu, Kele Yang, Yanwu Yergin, Mert Yu, Shuang Zeng, Lingxi Zhang, YingLin Zhao, Jiachen Zheng, Yefeng Zukovec, Martin Do, Richard Becker, Anton Simpson, Amber Konukoglu, Ender Jakab, Andras Bakas, Spyridon Joskowicz, Leo Menze, Bjoern Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Germany Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School United States Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Switzerland University Children’s Hospital Zurich University of Zurich Switzerland Department of Radioncology and Radiation Theraphy Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering ETH-Zurich Switzerland Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York City United States Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences Queen’s University Canada TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Germany McGovern Institute Massachusetts Institute of Technology United States Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unveristy Zurich Hospital Switzerland BioMedIA Imperial College London United Kingdom Department of Radiation Oncology University of Pennsylvania PA United States University of Pennsylvania PA United States Department of Radiation Oncology Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Georgia United States Nile University Cairo Egypt Department of Medical Sciences Acibadem University Istanbul Turkey Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Trustworthy Machine Learning Lab University of Sydney Australia Image Sciences Institute University Medical Center Utrecht Netherlands Computer Engineering Department Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Turkey School of Computer Science Shenzhen University Shenzhen China University of Alberta United States University of Ljubljana Faculty of Electrical Engineering Ljubljana Slovenia Tongji University Shanghai China OPPO Research Institute Shanghai China School of Biological and Medical Engineering Beihang University Beijing China Harvard Medical School Boston

Uncertainty in medical image segmentation tasks, especially inter-rater variability, arising from differences in interpretations and annotations by various experts, presents a significant challenge in achieving consistent and reliable image segmentation. This variability not only reflects the inherent complexity and subjective nature of medical image interpretation but also directly impacts the development and evaluation of automated segmentation algorithms. Accurately modeling and quantifying this variability is essential for enhancing the robustness and clinical applicability of these algorithms. We report the set-up and summarize the benchmark results of the Quantification of Uncertainties in Biomedical Image Quantification Challenge (QUBIQ), which was organized in conjunction with International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2020 and 2021. The challenge focuses on the uncertainty quantification of medical image segmentation which considers the omnipresence of inter-rater variability in imaging datasets. The large collection of images with multi-rater annotations features various modalities such as MRI and CT;various organs such as the brain, prostate, kidney, and pancreas;and different image dimensions 2D-vs-3D. A total of 24 teams submitted different solutions to the problem, combining various baseline models, Bayesian neural networks, and ensemble model techniques. The obtained results indicate the importance of the ensemble models, as well as the need for further research to develop efficient 3D methods for uncertainty quantification methods in 3D segmentation tasks. © 2024, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Image segmentation

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：