检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of Mariposa Christia Vespertilionis leaves towards antioxidant using response surface methodology

引用

Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2019年第1期1349卷

作者： Ariff, MAM Osman, M S Tukiman, S Razak, NAA Jaapar, J Faculty of Chemical Engineering Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang 13500 Permatang Pauh Penang MALAYSIA. Molecular System Design Process & Optimization Research Group (MODEPRO) Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang 13500 Permatang Pauh Penang MALAYSIA Faculty of Chemical Engineering Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang 13500 Permatang Pauh Penang MALAYSIA. Faculty of Computer Science and Mathematics Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang 13500 Permatang Pauh Penang MALAYSIA Faculty of Chemical Engineering Universiti Teknologi MARA 40450 Shah Alam Selangor MALAYSIA.

Mariposa Christia Vespertilionis (MCV) or also known as butterfly wing leaves, is popular in the traditional medicine practice. The objective of this study is to optimize the antioxidant components (based on antioxidant activity analysis) from the MCV leaves extract using Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) based on different temperature, pressure, and particle size via Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Besides that, it is also to evaluate the optimal condition of different extracting antioxidant activity from MCV leaves using design Expert 10 software. The condition range for both pressure and temperature were between 150-350 bar and 30-70 °C with constant extraction time. The size of particle samples were between 63 μm-1000 μm. The antioxidant was analyzed using UV–vis Spectrophotometer (UV-vis). The lowest antioxidant activity was 8.20 % and higher antioxidant activity was obtained at 49.76 %. Lower absorbance indicated highest free radical scavenging activities. Maximum percentage (%) indicated high scavenging activities, thus higher 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) is a good indication for antioxidant. The predicted RSM optimal condition of antioxidant activity was at temperature 50 °C, pressure 282 bar, and particle size 500 μm, which the predicted antioxidant was 50.62 %. Upon verification through experiment, it was found out that the antioxidant activity value was close to the predicted value with an average error of less than 1%.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

AtlFast3: The Next Generation of Fast Simulation in ATLAS

引用

Computing and Software for Big Science 2022年第1期6卷 1-54页

作者： Aad, G. Abbott, B. Abbott, D.C. Abud, A. Abed Abeling, K. Abhayasinghe, D.K. Abidi, S.H. Aboulhorma, A. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, H. Abulaiti, Y. Hoffman, A. C. Abusleme Acharya, B.S. Achkar, B. Adam, L. Bourdarios, C. Adam Adamczyk, L. Adamek, L. Addepalli, S.V. Adelman, J. Adiguzel, A. Adorni, S. Adye, T. Affolder, A.A. Afik, Y. Agapopoulou, C. Agaras, M.N. Agarwala, J. Aggarwal, A. Agheorghiesei, C. Aguilar-Saavedra, J.A. Ahmad, A. Ahmadov, F. Ahmed, W.S. Ai, X. Aielli, G. Aizenberg, I. Akatsuka, S. Akbiyik, M. Åkesson, T.P.A. Akimov, A.V. Khoury, K. Al Alberghi, G.L. Albert, J. Albicocco, P. Verzini, M. J. Alconada Alderweireldt, S. Aleksa, M. Aleksandrov, I.N. Alexa, C. Alexopoulos, T. Alfonsi, A. Alfonsi, F. Alhroob, M. Ali, B. Ali, S. Aliev, M. Alimonti, G. Allaire, C. Allbrooke, B.M.M. Allport, P.P. Aloisio, A. Alonso, F. Alpigiani, C. Camelia, E. Alunno Estevez, M. Alvarez Alviggi, M.G. Coutinho, Y. Amaral Ambler, A. Ambroz, L. Amelung, C. Amidei, D. Santos, S. P. Amor Dos Amoroso, S. Amos, K.R. Amrouche, C.S. Ananiev, V. Anastopoulos, C. Andari, N. Andeen, T. Anders, J.K. Andrean, S.Y. Andreazza, A. Angelidakis, S. Angerami, A. Anisenkov, A.V. Annovi, A. Antel, C. Anthony, M.T. Antipov, E. Antonelli, M. Antrim, D.J.A. Anulli, F. Aoki, M. Pozo, J. A. Aparisi Aparo, M.A. Bella, L. Aperio Aranzabal, N. Ferraz, V. Araujo Arcangeletti, C. Arce, A.T.H. Arena, E. Arguin, J.-F. Argyropoulos, S. Arling, J.-H. Armbruster, A.J. Armstrong, A. Arnaez, O. Arnold, H. Tame, Z. P. Arrubarrena Artoni, G. Asada, H. Asai, K. Asai, S. Asbah, N.A. Asimakopoulou, E.M. Asquith, L. Assahsah, J. Assamagan, K. Astalos, R. Atkin, R.J. Atkinson, M. Atlay, N.B. Atmani, H. Atmasiddha, P.A. Augsten, K. Auricchio, S. Austrup, V.A. Avner, G. Avolio, G. Ayoub, M.K. Azuelos, G. Babal, D. Bachacou, H. Bachas, K. Bachiu, A. Backman, F. Badea, A. Bagnaia, P. Bahrasemani, H. Bailey, A.J. Bailey, V.R. Baines, J.T. Bakalis, C. Baker, O.K. Bakker, P.J. Bakos, E. Gupta, D. Bakshi Balaji, S. Balasubramanian, R. Baldin, E.M. Balek, P. Ballabene, E. Bal Department of Physics University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia Department of Physics University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada Department of Physics Ankara University Ankara Turkey Division of Physics TOBB University of Economics and Technology Ankara Turkey LAPP Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc CNRS/IN2P3 Annecy France High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne IL United States Department of Physics University of Arizona Tucson AZ United States Department of Physics University of Texas at Arlington Arlington TX United States Physics Department National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece Physics Department National Technical University of Athens Zografou Greece Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin Austin TX United States Bahcesehir University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences Istanbul Turkey Istanbul Bilgi University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences Istanbul Turkey Department of Physics Bogazici University Istanbul Turkey Department of Physics Engineering Gaziantep University Gaziantep Turkey Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE) Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Barcelona Spain Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Physics Department Tsinghua University Beijing China Department of Physics Nanjing University Nanjing China University of Chinese Academy of Science (UCAS) Beijing China Institute of Physics University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia Department for Physics and Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California Berkeley CA United States Institut für Physik Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics University of Bern Bern Switzerland School of Physics and Astronomy University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom Facultad de Ciencias y Cen

The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider has a broad physics programme ranging from precision measurements to direct searches for new particles and new interactions, requiring ever larger and ever more accurate datasets of simulated Monte Carlo events. Detector simulation with Geant4 is accurate but requires significant CPU resources. Over the past decade, ATLAS has developed and utilized tools that replace the most CPU-intensive component of the simulation—the calorimeter shower simulation—with faster simulation methods. Here, AtlFast3, the next generation of high-accuracy fast simulation in ATLAS, is introduced. AtlFast3 combines parameterized approaches with machine-learning techniques and is deployed to meet current and future computing challenges, and simulation needs of the ATLAS experiment. With highly accurate performance and significantly improved modelling of substructure within jets, AtlFast3 can simulate large numbers of events for a wide range of physics processes. © 2022, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Evidence for the Higgs Boson Decay to a Z Boson and a Photon at the LHC

引用

Physical Review Letters 2024年第2期132卷 021803-021803页

作者： G. Aad B. Abbott K. Abeling N. J. Abicht S. H. Abidi A. Aboulhorma H. Abramowicz H. Abreu Y. Abulaiti B. S. Acharya C. Adam Bourdarios L. Adamczyk L. Adamek S. V. Addepalli M. J. Addison J. Adelman A. Adiguzel T. Adye A. A. Affolder Y. Afik M. N. Agaras J. Agarwala A. Aggarwal C. Agheorghiesei A. Ahmad F. Ahmadov W. S. Ahmed S. Ahuja X. Ai G. Aielli A. Aikot M. Ait Tamlihat B. Aitbenchikh I. Aizenberg M. Akbiyik T. P. A. Åkesson A. V. Akimov D. Akiyama N. N. Akolkar K. Al Khoury G. L. Alberghi J. Albert P. Albicocco G. L. Albouy S. Alderweireldt M. Aleksa I. N. Aleksandrov C. Alexa T. Alexopoulos F. Alfonsi M. Algren M. Alhroob B. Ali H. M. J. Ali S. Ali S. W. Alibocus M. Aliev G. Alimonti W. Alkakhi C. Allaire B. M. M. Allbrooke J. F. Allen C. A. Allendes Flores P. P. Allport A. Aloisio F. Alonso C. Alpigiani M. Alvarez Estevez A. Alvarez Fernandez M. Alves Cardoso M. G. Alviggi M. Aly Y. Amaral Coutinho A. Ambler C. Amelung M. Amerl C. G. Ames D. Amidei S. P. Amor Dos Santos K. R. Amos V. Ananiev C. Anastopoulos T. Andeen J. K. Anders S. Y. Andrean A. Andreazza S. Angelidakis A. Angerami A. V. Anisenkov A. Annovi C. Antel M. T. Anthony E. Antipov M. Antonelli F. Anulli M. Aoki T. Aoki J. A. Aparisi Pozo M. A. Aparo L. Aperio Bella C. Appelt A. Apyan N. Aranzabal C. Arcangeletti A. T. H. Arce E. Arena J-F. Arguin S. Argyropoulos J.-H. Arling O. Arnaez H. Arnold G. Artoni H. Asada K. Asai S. Asai N. A. Asbah J. Assahsah K. Assamagan R. Astalos S. Atashi R. J. Atkin M. Atkinson H. Atmani P. A. Atmasiddha K. Augsten S. Auricchio A. D. Auriol V. A. Austrup G. Avolio K. Axiotis G. Azuelos D. Babal H. Bachacou K. Bachas A. Bachiu F. Backman A. Badea P. Bagnaia M. Bahmani A. J. Bailey V. R. Bailey J. T. Baines L. Baines C. Bakalis O. K. Baker E. Bakos D. Bakshi Gupta V. Balakrishnan R. Balasubramanian E. M. Baldin P. Balek E. Ballabene F. Balli L. M. Baltes W. K. Balunas J. Balz E. Banas M. Bandieramonte A. Bandyopadhyay S. Bansal L. Barak M. Barakat E. L. Barberio D. Barberis M. Barbero M. Z. Barel K. N. Barends T. Ba Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Puebla Mexico ETH Zurich—Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics (IPA) Zurich Switzerland Institute of Nuclear Research ATOMKI Debrecen Hungary National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Faculté des sciences Université Mohammed V Rabat Morocco University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia Illinois USA University of Ruhuna Department of Physics Matara Sri Lanka INFN Sezione di Bologna Bologna Italy Università di Bologna Bologna Italy Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium AGH University of Krakow Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science Krakow Poland The University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia Universidad Iberoamericana Mexico City Mexico Instituto de Física de Cantabria (IFCA) CSIC-Universidad de Cantabria Santander Spain Department of Physics Istanbul University Istanbul Türkiye Imperial College London United Kingdom Baylor University Waco Texas USA Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology Lappeenranta Finland Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile INFN Sezione di Genova Genova Italy Università di Genova Genova Italy Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN Mexico City Mexico Department of Physics Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi Iasi Romania National Centre for Physics Quaid-I-Azam University Islamabad Pakistan Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet CNRS/IN2P3 Ecole Polytechnique Institut Polytechnique de Paris Palaiseau France University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand Riga Technical University Riga Latvia Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China INFN Sezione di Padova Padova Italy Università di Padova Padova Italy University of Mississippi Oxford Mississi

The first evidence for the Higgs boson decay to a Z boson and a photon is presented, with a statistical significance of 3.4 standard deviations. The result is derived from a combined analysis of the searches performed by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations with proton-proton collision datasets collected at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) from 2015 to 2018. These correspond to integrated luminosities of around 140 fb−1 for each experiment, at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The measured signal yield is 2.2±0.7 times the standard model prediction, and agrees with the theoretical expectation within 1.9 standard deviations.

关键词： Rare decays Higgs bosons W & Z bosons Hadron colliders

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Search for rare decays of the Z and Higgs bosons to a J/ψ or ψ(2S) meson and a photon in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV

引用

Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics 2025年 865卷

作者： Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J.W. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Hussain, P.S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Li, A. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Templ, S. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Darwish, M.R. Janssen, T. Van Mechelen, P. Breugelmans, N. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. Heyen, F. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Müller, D. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Onsem, G.P. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Bilin, B. Clerbaux, B. Das, A.K. De Lentdecker, G. Evard, H. Favart, L. Gianneios, P. Jaramillo, J. Khalilzadeh, A. Khan, F.A. Lee, K. Mahdavikhorrami, M. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Shahzad, M.A. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Gokbulut, G. Hong, Y. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Marckx, D. Mota Amarilo, K. Samalan, A. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. van der Linden, J. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bethani, A. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. De Favereau De Jeneret, J. Delaere, C. Donertas, I.S. Giammanco, A. Guzel, A.O. Jain, Sh. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Tran, T.T. Wertz, S. Alves, G.A. Alves Gallo Pereira, M. Coelho, E. Correia Silva, G. Hensel, C. Menezes De Oliveira, T. Moraes, A. Rebello Teles, P. Soeiro, M. Vilela Pereira, A. Aldá Júnior, W.L. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E.M. Da Silveira, G.G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Gomes De Souza, R. Macedo, M. Martins, J. Mora Herrera, C. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Pinheiro, J.P. Santoro, A. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Bernardes, C.A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T.R. Gregores, E.M. Maietto Silverio, I. Mercadante, P.G. Novaes, S.F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Javaid, T. Yuan, L. Hu, Z. Liang, Z. Liu, J. Yi, K. Chen, G.M. Chen, H.S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C.H. Kapoor, A. Liao, H. Liu, Z.-A. Shar Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science and Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter South China Normal University Guangzhou China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China Institute of Modern Physics Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics Ion-beam Application (MOE) Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Zhejiang Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Ene

A search is presented for rare decays of the [Figure presented] and Higgs bosons to a photon and a [Figure presented] or a [Figure presented] meson, with the charmonium state subsequentially decaying to a pair of muons. The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 123fb⁻¹ of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. No evidence for branching fractions of these rare decay channels larger than predicted in the standard model is observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set: [Figure presented], [Figure presented], [Figure presented], and [Figure presented]. The ratio of the Higgs boson coupling modifiers [Figure presented] is constrained to be in the interval (−157,+199) at 95% confidence level. Assuming [Figure presented], this interval becomes (−166,+208). © 2025 CERN for the benefit of the CMS Collaboration

关键词： CMS Higgs J/psi Photon Rare decays SMP

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Girth and groomed radius of jets recoiling against isolated photons in lead-lead and proton-proton collisions at s_NN=5.02 TeV

引用

Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics 2025年 861卷

作者： Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J.W. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Hussain, P.S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Li, A. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Templ, S. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Darwish, M.R. Janssen, T. Van Mechelen, P. Bols, E.S. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Müller, D. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Onsem, G.P. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Clerbaux, B. Das, A.K. De Lentdecker, G. Evard, H. Favart, L. Gianneios, P. Hohov, D. Jaramillo, J. Khalilzadeh, A. Khan, F.A. Lee, K. Mahdavikhorrami, M. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Hong, Y. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Mestdach, G. Mota Amarilo, K. Rendón, C. Samalan, A. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. van der Linden, J. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bethani, A. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. Delaere, C. Donertas, I.S. Giammanco, A. Jain, Sh. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Tran, T.T. Wertz, S. Alves, G.A. Coelho, E. Hensel, C. Menezes De Oliveira, T. Moraes, A. Rebello Teles, P. Soeiro, M. Aldá Júnior, W.L. Alves Gallo Pereira, M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E.M. Da Silveira, G.G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Gomes De Souza, R. Martins, J. Mora Herrera, C. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Pinheiro, J.P. Santoro, A. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Vilela Pereira, A. Bernardes, C.A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T.R. Gregores, E.M. Mercadante, P.G. Novaes, S.F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Javaid, T. Yuan, L. Hu, Z. Liu, J. Yi, K. Chen, G.M. Chen, H.S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C.H. Kapoor, A. Liao, H. Liu, Z.-A. Sharma, R. Song, J.N. Tao, J. Wang, C. Wang, J. Wang, Z. Zhang, H. Agapitos, A. Ban, Y. Levin, A. Li, C. Li, Q. Mao, Y. Qian, S.J. S Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China Institute of Modern Physics Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics Ion-beam Application (MOE) Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Zhejiang Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU) Fayoum University El-Fayoum Egypt National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tall

This Letter presents the first measurements of the groomed jet radius Rg and the jet girth g in events with an isolated photon recoiling against a jet in lead-lead (PbPb) and proton-proton (pp) collisions at the LHC a... 详细信息

This Letter presents the first measurements of the groomed jet radius R_g and the jet girth g in events with an isolated photon recoiling against a jet in lead-lead (PbPb) and proton-proton (pp) collisions at the LHC at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV. The observables R_g and g provide a quantitative measure of how narrow or broad a jet is. The analysis uses PbPb and pp data samples with integrated luminosities of 1.7 nb⁻¹ and 301 pb⁻¹, respectively, collected with the CMS experiment in 2018 and 2017. Events are required to have a photon with transverse momentum p_T^γ>100 GeV and at least one jet back-to-back in azimuth with respect to the photon and with transverse momentum p_T^jet such that p_T^jet/p_T^γ>0.4. The measured R_g and g distributions are unfolded to the particle level, which facilitates the comparison between the PbPb and pp results and with theoretical predictions. It is found that jets with p_T^jet/p_T^γ>0.8, i.e., those that closely balance the photon p_T^γ, are narrower in PbPb than in pp collisions. Relaxing the selection to include jets with p_T^jet/p_T^γ>0.4 reduces the narrowing of the angular structure of jets in PbPb relative to the pp reference. This shows that selection bias effects associated with jet energy loss play an important role in the interpretation of jet substructure measurements. © 2024 CERN for the benefit of the CMS Collaboration

关键词： CMS Gluons Jet substructure Jets Lead-lead Photon Proton-proton

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Erratum to: Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying to a top quark pair in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2022年第3期2022卷 1-21页

作者： Sirunyan, A. M. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Ambrogi, F. Bergauer, T. Brandstetter, J. Dragicevic, M. Erö, J. Escalante Del Valle, A. Flechl, M. Frühwirth, R. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Krätschmer, I. Liko, D. Madlener, T. Mikulec, I. Rad, N. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Spanring, M. Spitzbart, D. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Zarucki, M. Drugakov, V. Mossolov, V. Suarez Gonzalez, J. Darwish, M. R. De Wolf, E. A. Di Croce, D. Janssen, X. Lauwers, J. Lelek, A. Pieters, M. Rejeb Sfar, H. Van Haevermaet, H. Van Mechelen, P. Van Putte, S. Van Remortel, N. Blekman, F. Bols, E. S. Chhibra, S. S. D’Hondt, J. De Clercq, J. Lontkovskyi, D. Lowette, S. Marchesini, I. Moortgat, S. Moreels, L. Python, Q. Skovpen, K. Tavernier, S. Van Doninck, W. Van Mulders, P. Van Parijs, I. Beghin, D. Bilin, B. Brun, H. Clerbaux, B. De Lentdecker, G. Delannoy, H. Dorney, B. Favart, L. Grebenyuk, A. Kalsi, A. K. Luetic, J. Popov, A. Postiau, N. Starling, E. Thomas, L. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. Vannerom, D. Cornelis, T. Dobur, D. Khvastunov, I. Niedziela, M. Roskas, C. Trocino, D. Tytgat, M. Verbeke, W. Vermassen, B. Vit, M. Zaganidis, N. Bondu, O. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. David, P. Delaere, C. Delcourt, M. Giammanco, A. Lemaitre, V. Magitteri, A. Prisciandaro, J. Saggio, A. Vidal Marono, M. Vischia, P. Zobec, J. Alves, F. L. Alves, G. A. Correia Silva, G. Hensel, C. Moraes, A. Rebello Teles, P. Belchior Batista Das Chagas, E. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Coelho, E. Da Costa, E. M. Da Silveira, G. G. De Jesus Damiao, D. De Oliveira Martins, C. Fonseca De Souza, S. Huertas Guativa, L. M. Malbouisson, H. Martins, J. Matos Figueiredo, D. Medina Jaime, M. Melo De Almeida, M. Mora Herrera, C. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Prado Da Silva, W. L. Sanchez Rosas, L. J. Santoro, A. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Tonelli Manganote, E. J. Torres Da Silva De Araujo, F. Vilela Pereira, A. Ahuja, S. Bernardes, C. A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T. R. Gregores, E. M. Lemos, D. S. Mercadante, P. G. Novaes, S. F. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Wien Austria Vienna University of Technology Vienna Austria Institute for Nuclear Problems Minsk Belarus Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium IRFU CEA Université Paris-Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette France Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil UFMS Nova Andradina Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista São Paulo Brazil Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov of NRC ‘Kurchatov Institute’ Moscow Russia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna Russia Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Cairo University Cairo Egypt Academy of Scientific Research and Technolog

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

First measurement of the forward rapidity gap distribution in pPb collisions at sNN=8.16 TeV

引用

Physical Review D 2023年第9期108卷 092004-092004页

作者： A. Tumasyan W. Adam F. Ambrogi T. Bergauer M. Dragicevic J. Erö A. Escalante Del Valle R. Frühwirth M. Jeitler N. Krammer L. Lechner D. Liko T. Madlener I. Mikulec F. M. Pitters N. Rad J. Schieck R. Schöfbeck M. Spanring S. Templ W. Waltenberger C.-E. Wulz M. Zarucki M. R. Darwish E. A. De Wolf D. Di Croce T. Janssen T. Kello A. Lelek M. Pieters H. Rejeb Sfar H. Van Haevermaet P. Van Mechelen S. Van Putte N. Van Remortel F. Blekman E. S. Bols S. S. Chhibra J. D’Hondt J. De Clercq D. Lontkovskyi S. Lowette I. Marchesini S. Moortgat A. Morton Q. Python S. Tavernier W. Van Doninck P. Van Mulders D. Beghin B. Bilin B. Clerbaux G. De Lentdecker B. Dorney L. Favart A. Grebenyuk A. K. Kalsi I. Makarenko L. Moureaux L. Pétré A. Popov N. Postiau E. Starling L. Thomas C. Vander Velde P. Vanlaer D. Vannerom L. Wezenbeek T. Cornelis D. Dobur M. Gruchala I. Khvastunov M. Niedziela C. Roskas K. Skovpen M. Tytgat W. Verbeke B. Vermassen M. Vit G. Bruno F. Bury C. Caputo P. David C. Delaere M. Delcourt I. S. Donertas A. Giammanco V. Lemaitre K. Mondal J. Prisciandaro A. Taliercio M. Teklishyn P. Vischia S. Wuyckens J. Zobec G. A. Alves C. Hensel A. Moraes W. L. Aldá Júnior E. Belchior Batista Das Chagas H. Brandao Malbouisson W. Carvalho J. Chinellato E. Coelho E. M. Da Costa G. G. Da Silveira D. De Jesus Damiao S. Fonseca De Souza J. Martins D. Matos Figueiredo M. Medina Jaime M. Melo De Almeida C. Mora Herrera L. Mundim H. Nogima P. Rebello Teles L. J. Sanchez Rosas A. Santoro S. M. Silva Do Amaral A. Sznajder M. Thiel E. J. Tonelli Manganote F. Torres Da Silva De Araujo A. Vilela Pereira C. A. Bernardes L. Calligaris T. R. Fernandez Perez Tomei E. M. Gregores D. S. Lemos P. G. Mercadante S. F. Novaes Sandra S. Padula A. Aleksandrov G. Antchev I. Atanassov R. Hadjiiska P. Iaydjiev M. Misheva M. Rodozov M. Shopova G. Sultanov M. Bonchev A. Dimitrov T. Ivanov L. Litov B. Pavlov P. Petkov A. Petrov W. Fang Q. Guo H. Wang L. Yuan M. Ahmad Z. Hu Y. Wang E. Chapon G. M. Chen H. S. Chen M. Chen A. Kapoor D. Leggat H. Liao Z.-A. Liu R Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Beihang University Beijing China Rutgers The State University of New Jersey Piscataway New Jersey USA Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Massachusetts USA State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China The University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE)—Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU) Fayoum University El-Fayoum E

For the first time at LHC energies, the forward rapidity gap spectra from proton-lead collisions for both proton and lead dissociation processes are presented. The analysis is performed over 10.4 units of pseudorapidity at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of sNN=8.16 TeV, almost 300 times higher than in previous measurements of diffractive production in proton-nucleus collisions. For lead dissociation processes, which correspond to the pomeron-lead event topology, the epos-lhc generator predictions are a factor of 2 below the data, but the model gives a reasonable description of the rapidity gap spectrum shape. For the pomeron-proton topology, the epos-lhc, qgsjet ii, and hijing predictions are all at least a factor of 5 lower than the data. The latter effect might be explained by a significant contribution of ultraperipheral photoproduction events mimicking the signature of diffractive processes. These data may be of significant help in understanding the high energy limit of quantum chromodynamics and for modeling cosmic ray air showers.

关键词： Particle correlations & fluctuations Relativistic heavy-ion collisions Hadron colliders

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Search for new Higgs bosons via same-sign top quark pair production in association with a jet in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV

引用

Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics 2024年 850卷

作者： Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J.W. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Hussain, P.S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Li, A. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Templ, S. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Darwish, M.R. Janssen, T. Van Mechelen, P. Bols, E.S. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. El Faham, H. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Müller, D. Sahasransu, A.R. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Clerbaux, B. De Lentdecker, G. Favart, L. Hohov, D. Jaramillo, J. Khalilzadeh, A. Lee, K. Mahdavikhorrami, M. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Pétré, L. Postiau, N. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Hong, Y. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Mestdach, G. Rendón, C. Samalan, A. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. van der Linden, J. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. Delaere, C. Donertas, I.S. Giammanco, A. Jaffel, K. Jain, Sh. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Mondal, K. Tran, T.T. Wertz, S. Alves, G.A. Coelho, E. Hensel, C. Menezes De Oliveira, T. Moraes, A. Rebello Teles, P. Soeiro, M. Aldá Júnior, W.L. Alves Gallo Pereira, M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E.M. Da Silveira, G.G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Martins, J. Mora Herrera, C. Mota Amarilo, K. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Santoro, A. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Vilela Pereira, A. Bernardes, C.A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T.R. Gregores, E.M. Mercadante, P.G. Novaes, S.F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Guo, Q. Javaid, T. Yuan, L. Hu, Z. Liu, J. Yi, K. Chen, G.M. Chen, H.S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C.H. Kapoor, A. Liao, H. Liu, Z.-A. Sharma, R. Song, J.N. Tao, J. Wang, C. Wang, J. Wang, Z. Zhang, H. Agapitos, A. Ban, Y. Levin, A. Li, C. Li, Q. Mao, Y. Qian, S.J. Sun, X. Wang, D. Yang, H. Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China Institute of Modern Physics Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics Ion-beam Application (MOE) Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Zhejiang Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU) Fayoum University El-Fayoum Egypt National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tall

A search is presented for new Higgs bosons in proton-proton (pp) collision events in which a same-sign top quark pair is produced in association with a jet, via the pp→tH/A→ttc‾ and pp→tH/A→ttu‾ processes. Here, H and A represent the extra scalar and pseudoscalar boson, respectively, of the second Higgs doublet in the generalized two-Higgs-doublet model (g2HDM). The search is based on pp collision data collected at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb⁻¹. Final states with a same-sign lepton pair in association with jets and missing transverse momentum are considered. New Higgs bosons in the 200–1000 GeV mass range and new Yukawa couplings between 0.1 and 1.0 are targeted in the search, for scenarios in which either H or A appear alone, or in which they coexist and interfere. No significant excess above the standard model prediction is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in the context of the g2HDM. © 2024 The Author(s)

关键词： CMS Extra Higgs boson Top quarks Yukawa couplings

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Bilic, Patrick Christ, Patrick Li, Hongwei Bran Vorontsov, Eugene Ben-Cohen, Avi Kaissis, Georgios Szeskin, Adi Jacobs, Colin Mamani, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Chartrand, Gabriel Lohöfer, Fabian Holch, Julian Walter Sommer, Wieland Hofmann, Felix Hostettler, Alexandre Lev-Cohain, Naama Drozdzal, Michal Amitai, Michal Marianne Vivanti, Refael Sosna, Jacob Ezhov, Ivan Sekuboyina, Anjany Navarro, Fernando Kofler, Florian Paetzold, Johannes C. Shit, Suprosanna Hu, Xiaobin Lipková, Jana Rempfler, Markus Piraud, Marie Kirschke, Jan Wiestler, Benedikt Zhang, Zhiheng Hülsemeyer, Christian Beetz, Marcel Ettlinger, Florian Antonelli, Michela Bae, Woong Bellver, Míriam Bi, Lei Chen, Hao Chlebus, Grzegorz Dam, Erik B. Dou, Qi Fu, Chi-Wing Georgescu, Bogdan Giró-I-Nieto, Xavier Gruen, Felix Han, Xu Heng, Pheng-Ann Hesser, Jürgen Moltz, Jan Hendrik Igel, Christian Isensee, Fabian Jäger, Paul Jia, Fucang Kaluva, Krishna Chaitanya Khened, Mahendra Kim, Ildoo Kim, Jae-Hun Kim, Sungwoong Kohl, Simon Konopczynski, Tomasz Kori, Avinash Krishnamurthi, Ganapathy Li, Fan Li, Hongchao Li, Junbo Li, Xiaomeng Lowengrub, John Ma, Jun Maier-Hein, Klaus Maninis, Kevis-Kokitsi Meine, Hans Merhof, Dorit Pai, Akshay Perslev, Mathias Petersen, Jens Pont-Tuset, Jordi Qi, Jin Qi, Xiaojuan Rippel, Oliver Roth, Karsten Sarasua, Ignacio Schenk, Andrea Shen, Zengming Torres, Jordi Wachinger, Christian Wang, Chunliang Weninger, Leon Wu, Jianrong Xu, Daguang Yang, Xiaoping Yu, Simon Chun-Ho Yuan, Yading Yue, Miao Zhang, Liping Cardoso, Jorge Bakas, Spyridon Braren, Rickmer Heinemann, Volker Pal, Christopher Tang, An Kadoury, Samuel Soler, Luc van Ginneken, Bram Greenspan, Hayit Joskowicz, Leo Menze, Bjoern Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Switzerland Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal Canada Department of Medical Imaging Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Netherlands Department of Biomedical Engineering Tel-Aviv University Israel Germany Pattern Analysis and Learning Group Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Philips Research China Philips China Innovation Campus Shanghai China School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences King0s College London London United Kingdom Institute for AI in Medicine Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Computer Science Guangdong University of Foreign Studies China Institute for diagnostic and interventional radiology Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Klinikum Rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital Nanjing University Medical School China Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School United States School of Computer Science and Engineering The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel University of Pennsylvania PA United States Pte. Ltd. Singapore Medical Imaging and Reconstruction Lab Department of Engineering Design Indian Institute of Technology Madras India Sensetime Shanghai China Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PA United States Co. Ltd China MontréalQC Canada Department of Radiology Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine University of Montréal

In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://***/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via ***. © 2019, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Deep learning

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions from the production of Higgs bosons using the ττ final state

引用

Physical Review D 2023年第3期108卷 032013-032013页

作者： A. Tumasyan W. Adam J. W. Andrejkovic T. Bergauer S. Chatterjee K. Damanakis M. Dragicevic A. Escalante Del Valle R. Frühwirth M. Jeitler N. Krammer L. Lechner D. Liko I. Mikulec P. Paulitsch F. M. Pitters J. Schieck R. Schöfbeck D. Schwarz S. Templ W. Waltenberger C.-E. Wulz M. R. Darwish E. A. De Wolf T. Janssen T. Kello A. Lelek H. Rejeb Sfar P. Van Mechelen S. Van Putte N. Van Remortel E. S. Bols J. D’Hondt A. De Moor M. Delcourt H. El Faham S. Lowette S. Moortgat A. Morton D. Müller A. R. Sahasransu S. Tavernier W. Van Doninck D. Vannerom D. Beghin B. Bilin B. Clerbaux G. De Lentdecker L. Favart A. K. Kalsi K. Lee M. Mahdavikhorrami I. Makarenko L. Moureaux S. Paredes L. Pétré A. Popov N. Postiau E. Starling L. Thomas M. Vanden Bemden C. Vander Velde P. Vanlaer T. Cornelis D. Dobur J. Knolle L. Lambrecht G. Mestdach M. Niedziela C. Rendón C. Roskas A. Samalan K. Skovpen M. Tytgat N. Van Den Bossche B. Vermassen L. Wezenbeek A. Benecke A. Bethani G. Bruno F. Bury C. Caputo P. David C. Delaere I. S. Donertas A. Giammanco K. Jaffel Sa. Jain V. Lemaitre K. Mondal J. Prisciandaro A. Taliercio M. Teklishyn T. T. Tran P. Vischia S. Wertz G. A. Alves C. Hensel A. Moraes P. Rebello Teles W. L. Aldá Júnior M. Alves Gallo Pereira M. Barroso Ferreira Filho H. Brandao Malbouisson W. Carvalho J. Chinellato E. M. Da Costa G. G. Da Silveira D. De Jesus Damiao V. Dos Santos Sousa S. Fonseca De Souza C. Mora Herrera K. Mota Amarilo L. Mundim H. Nogima A. Santoro S. M. Silva Do Amaral A. Sznajder M. Thiel F. Torres Da Silva De Araujo A. Vilela Pereira C. A. Bernardes L. Calligaris T. R. Fernandez Perez Tomei E. M. Gregores D. S. Lemos P. G. Mercadante S. F. Novaes Sandra S. Padula A. Aleksandrov G. Antchev R. Hadjiiska P. Iaydjiev M. Misheva M. Rodozov M. Shopova G. Sultanov A. Dimitrov T. Ivanov L. Litov B. Pavlov P. Petkov A. Petrov T. Cheng T. Javaid M. Mittal L. Yuan M. Ahmad G. Bauer C. Dozen Z. Hu J. Martins Y. Wang K. Yi E. Chapon G. M. Chen H. S. Chen M. Chen F. Iemmi A. Kapoor D. Leggat H. Liao Z.-A. Liu V. Milosevic Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Korea University Seoul Korea Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Massachusetts USA State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE)—Fudan University Shanghai China Rice University Houston Texas USA Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU) Fayoum University El-Fayoum Egypt National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tallinn Estonia Department of Physics Universi

A study of anomalous couplings of the Higgs boson to vector bosons and fermions is presented. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at a center-of-mass energy of pp collisions at the LHC of 13 TeV and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb−1. The study uses Higgs boson candidates produced mainly in gluon fusion or electroweak vector boson fusion at the LHC that subsequently decay to a pair of τ leptons. Matrix-element and machine-learning techniques were employed in a search for anomalous interactions. The results are combined with those from the four-lepton and two-photon decay channels to yield the most stringent constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to date. The pure CP-odd scenario of the Higgs boson coupling to gluons is excluded at 2.4 standard deviations. The results are consistent with the standard model predictions.

关键词： W & Z bosons Higgs bosons Tau leptons Hadron colliders

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：