检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2024年

作者： de la Rosa, Ezequiel Reyes, Mauricio Liew, Sook-Lei Hutton, Alexandre Wiest, Roland Kaesmacher, Johannes Hanning, Uta Hakim, Arsany Zubal, Richard Valenzuela, Waldo Robben, David Sima, Diana M. Anania, Vincenzo Brys, Arne Meakin, James A. Mickan, Anne Broocks, Gabriel Heitkamp, Christian Gao, Shengbo Liang, Kongming Zhang, Ziji Siddiquee, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Myronenko, Andriy Ashtari, Pooya Van Huffel, Sabine Jeong, Hyun-Su Yoon, Chi-Ho Kim, Chulhong Huo, Jiayu Ourselin, Sebastien Sparks, Rachel Clèrigues, Albert Oliver, Arnau Lladó, Xavier Chalcroft, Liam Pappas, Ioannis Bertels, Jeroen Heylen, Ewout Moreau, Juliette Hatami, Nima Frindel, Carole Qayyum, Abdul Mazher, Moona Puig, Domenec Lin, Shao-Chieh Juan, Chun-Jung Hu, Tianxi Boone, Lyndon Goubran, Maged Liu, Yi-Jui Wegener, Susanne Kofler, Florian Ezhov, Ivan Shit, Suprosanna Hernandez Petzsche, Moritz R. Menze, Bjoern Kirschke, Jan S. Wiestler, Benedikt Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany Icometrix Leuven Belgium ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Bern University of Bern Switzerland University of Bern Bern Switzerland Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy University of Southern California Los AngelesCA United States Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute Department of Neurology Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Inselspital Bern Switzerland University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Hospital Bern Inselspital University of Bern Bern Switzerland Department of Diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany Department of Medical Imaging Radboud University Medical Center Institute for Health Sciences Nijmegen Netherlands Deepwise AI Lab Beijing China Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Bejing China School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence Arizona State University TempeAZ United States NVIDIA Santa ClaraCA United States STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems Signal Processing and Data Analytics KU Leuven Leuven Belgium Pohang Korea Republic of School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences King’s College London United Kingdom Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics University of Girona Spain Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging University College London London United Kingdom Laboratory of Neuro Imaging Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles United States KU Leuven Leuven Belgium CREATIS Université Lyon1 CNRS UMR5220 INSERM U1206 INSA-Lyon Villeurbanne696

Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is essential for stroke diagnosis, treatment decisions, and prognosis. However, image and disease variability hinder the development of generalizable AI algorithms with clinical value. We address this gap by presenting a novel ensemble algorithm derived from the 2022 Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation (ISLES) challenge. ISLES’22 provided 400 patient scans with ischemic stroke from various medical centers, facilitating the development of a wide range of cutting-edge segmentation algorithms by the research community. By assessing them against a hidden test set, we identified strengths, weaknesses, and potential biases. Through collaboration with leading teams, we combined top-performing algorithms into an ensemble model that overcomes the limitations of individual solutions. Our ensemble model combines the individual algorithms’ strengths and achieved superior ischemic lesion detection and segmentation accuracy (median Dice score: 0.82, median lesion-wise F1 score: 0.86) on our internal test set compared to individual algorithms. This accuracy generalized well across diverse image and disease variables. Furthermore, the model excelled in extracting clinical biomarkers like lesion types and affected vascular territories. Notably, in a Turing-like test, neuroradiologists consistently preferred the algorithm’s segmentations over manual expert efforts, highlighting increased comprehensiveness and precision. Validation using a real-world external dataset (N=1686) confirmed the model’s generalizability (median Dice score: 0.82, median lesion-wise F1 score: 0.86). The algorithm’s outputs also demonstrated strong correlations with clinical scores (admission NIHSS and 90-day mRS) on par with or exceeding expert-derived results, underlining its clinical relevance. This study offers two key findings. First, we present an ensemble algorithm that detects and segments ischemic stroke lesions on DWI across diverse scenarios on par with expert (neuro)rad

关键词： Diagnosis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Metrics Reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Maier-Hein, Lena Reinke, Annika Godau, Patrick Tizabi, Minu D. Buettner, Florian Christodoulou, Evangelia Glocker, Ben Isensee, Fabian Kleesiek, Jens Kozubek, Michal Reyes, Mauricio Riegler, Michael A. Wiesenfarth, Manuel Emre Kavur, A. Sudre, Carole H. Baumgartner, Michael Eisenmann, Matthias Heckmann-Nötzel, Doreen Rädsch, Tim Acion, Laura Antonelli, Michela Arbel, Tal Bakas, Spyridon Benis, Arriel Blaschko, Matthew B. Jorge Cardoso, M. Cheplygina, Veronika Cimini, Beth A. Collins, Gary S. Farahani, Keyvan Ferrer, Luciana Galdran, Adrian Ginneken, Bram Van Haase, Robert Hashimoto, Daniel A. Hoffman, Michael M. Huisman, Merel Jannin, Pierre Kahn, Charles E. Kainmueller, Dagmar Kainz, Bernhard Karargyris, Alexandros Karthikesalingam, Alan Kenngott, Hannes Kofler, Florian Kopp-Schneider, Annette Kreshuk, Anna Kurc, Tahsin Landman, Bennett A. Litjens, Geert Madani, Amin Maier-Hein, Klaus Martel, Anne L. Mattson, Peter Meijering, Erik Menze, Bjoern Moons, Karel G.M. Müller, Henning Nichyporuk, Brennan Nickel, Felix Petersen, Jens Rajpoot, Nasir Rieke, Nicola Saez-Rodriguez, Julio Sánchez, Clara I. Shetty, Shravya Smeden, Maarten Van Summers, Ronald M. Taha, Abdel A. Tiulpin, Aleksei Tsaftaris, Sotirios A. Calster, Ben Van Varoquaux, Gaël Jäger, Paul F. Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems and HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg a partnership between DKFZ University Medical Center Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany partner site Frankfurt/Mainz a partnership between DKFZ and UCT Frankfurt-Marburg Germany Heidelberg Goethe University Frankfurt Germany Department of Medicine Goethe University Frankfurt Germany Department of Informatics Frankfurt Cancer Insititute Germany Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing and HI Applied Computer Vision Lab Germany Institute for AI in Medicine University Medicine Essen Essen Germany Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Faculty of Informatics Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Bern University of Bern Bern Switzerland Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital Engineering Oslo Norway UiT The Arctic University of Norway Romsø Norway Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Division of Medical Image Computing HI Applied Computer Vision Lab Germany MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing Department of Computer Science University College London London United Kingdom School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science King’s College London London United Kingdom Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Instituto de Cálculo CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom McGill University Montréal

Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. Particularly in automatic biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, thus failing to adequately measure scientific progress and hindering translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, we created Metrics Reloaded, a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics. It was developed by a large international consortium in a multi-stage Delphi process and is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint – a structured representation of the given problem that captures all aspects that are relevant for metric selection, from the domain interest to the properties of the target structure(s), data set and algorithm output. Based on the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics while being made aware of potential pitfalls. Metrics Reloaded targets image analysis problems that can be interpreted as a classification task at image, object or pixel level, namely image-level classification, object detection, semantic segmentation, and instance segmentation tasks. To improve the user experience, we implemented the framework in the Metrics Reloaded online tool. Following the convergence of ML methodology across application domains, Metrics Reloaded fosters the convergence of validation methodology. Its applicability is demonstrated for various biomedical use cases. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Semantic Segmentation

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

NTIRE 2021 Challenge on image Deblurring

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Nah, Seungjun Son, Sanghyun Lee, Suyoung Timofte, Radu Lee, Kyoung Mu Chen, Liangyu Zhang, Jie Lu, Xin Chu, Xiaojie Chen, Chengpeng Xiong, Zhiwei Xu, Ruikang Xiao, Zeyu Huang, Jie Zhang, Yueyi Xi, Si Wei, Jia Bai, Haoran Cheng, Songsheng Wei, Hao Sun, Long Tang, Jinhui Pan, Jinshan Lee, Donghyeon Lee, Chulhee Kim, Taesung Wang, Xiaobing Zhang, Dafeng Pan, Zhihong Lin, Tianwei Wu, Wenhao He, Dongliang Li, Baopu Li, Boyun Xi, Teng Zhang, Gang Liu, Jingtuo Han, Junyu Ding, Errui Tao, Guangpin Chu, Wenqing Cao, Yun Luo, Donghao Tai, Ying Lu, Tong Wang, Chengjie Li, Jilin Huang, Feiyue Chen, Hanting Chen, Shuaijun Guo, Tianyu Wang, Yunhe Zamir, Syed Waqas Arora, Aditya Khan, Salman Hayat, Munawar Khan, Fahad Shahbaz Shao, Ling Zuo, Yushen Ou, Yimin Chai, Yuanjun Shi, Lei Liu, Shuai Lei, Lei Feng, Chaoyu Zeng, Kai Yao, Yuying Liu, Xinran Zhang, Zhizhou Huang, Huacheng Zhang, Yunchen Jiang, Mingchao Zou, Wenbin Miao, Si Kim, Yangwoo Sun, Yuejin Deng, Senyou Ren, Wenqi Cao, Xiaochun Wang, Tao Suin, Maitreya Rajagopalan, A.N. Duong, Vinh Van Nguyen, Thuc Huu Yim, Jonghoon Jeon, Byeungwoo Li, Ru Xie, Junwei Han, Jong-Wook Choi, Jun-Ho Kim, Jun-Hyuk Lee, Jong-Seok Zhang, Jiaxin Peng, Fan Svitov, David Pakulich, Dmitry Kim, Jaeyeob Jeong, Jechang Department of ECE ASRI SNU Korea Republic of Computer Vision Lab ETH Zurich Switzerland University of Science and Technology of China China Megvii China Fudan University China Peking University China Netease Games AI Lab Nanjing University of Science and Technology China Guilin University of Electronic Technology China Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd Sunmoon University Asan Korea Republic of Samsung Research China Beijing China Baidu Research United States Department of Computer Vision Technology Baidu Inc China Fudan University China Megvii China Nanjing University China Tencent Noah's Ark Lab Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd Inception Institute of Artificial Intelligence Tsinghua University Beijing China North China University of Technology China Xiaomi South China University of Technology China Lab of Image Science and Technology Southeast University China China Design Group Co. Ltd China JOYY AI GROUP Fujian Normal University China Shanghai Advanced Research Institute Chinese Academy of Sciences China Institute of Information Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences China Huawei Noah's Ark Lab Indian Institute of Technology Madras India Department of ECE Sungkyunkwan University Korea Republic of Fuzhou University China Imperial Vision Co. Ltd School of Integrated Technology Yonsei University Korea Republic of Expasoft LLC Institute of Automation and Electrometry The SB RAS Image Communication & Signal Processing Laboratory Hanyang University Korea Republic of

Motion blur is a common photography artifact in dynamic environments that typically comes jointly with the other types of degradation. This paper reviews the NTIRE 2021 Challenge on image Deblurring. In this challenge report, we describe the challenge specifics and the evaluation results from the 2 competition tracks with the proposed solutions. While both the tracks aim to recover a high-quality clean image from a blurry image, different artifacts are jointly involved. In track 1, the blurry images are in a low resolution while track 2 images are compressed in JPEG format. In each competition, there were 338 and 238 registered participants and in the final testing phase, 18 and 17 teams competed. The winning methods demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance on the image deblurring task with the jointly combined artifacts. © 2021, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： image enhancement

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

An improved convex programming model for the inverse problem in intensity-modulated radiation therapy

引用

International Journal of Performability engineering 2018年第5期14卷 871-884页

作者： Lan, Yihua Zhang, Xingang Zhang, Jianyang Wang, Yang Hung, Chih-Cheng School of Computer and Information Technology Nanyang Normal University Nanyang473061 China Institute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition Nanyang Normal University Nanyang473061 China Radiology Department Central Hospital of Nanyang Nanyang473061 China Laboratory for Machine Vision and Security Research College of Computing and Software Engineering Kennesaw State University - Marietta Campus 1100 South Marietta Parkway MariettaGA30067-2896 United States

Intensity modulated radiation therapy technology (IMRT) is one of the main approaches in cancer treatment because it can guarantee the killing of cancer cells while optimally protecting normal tissue from complications. Inverse planning, which is the core component of the entire IMRT system, is mainly based on accurate mathematical modeling and associated fast solving methods. In inverse planning, the fluence map optimization, which considers the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) modulation, is the current research focus. Although the hitting constrain problem with the unidirectional movement of leaf-sweeping has been solved, our goal is to solve the hitting constrain problem with the bidirectional movement of leaf-sweeping. In this study, we propose a non-synchronized type to solve the hitting constrain problem with the bidirectional movement of leaf-sweeping schemes for IMRT. In solving this problem, a new mathematical model is proposed under the framework of convex programming. The advantage of the convex model is to avoid the uncertainty and inaccuracy that occurs in the non-convex programming solving process. Experimental results for two clinical testing cases show that under the same condition of total number of monitoring units, the new proposed model produces better dose distribution than those of the total variance and quadratic models. © 2018 Totem Publisher, Inc. All rights reserved.

关键词： Convex optimization

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

AIM 2019 challenge on real-world image super-resolution: Methods and results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Lugmayr, Andreas Danelljan, Martin Timofte, Radu Fritsche, Manuel Gu, Shuhang Purohit, Kuldeep Kandula, Praveen Suin, Maitreya Rajagopalan, A.N. Joon, Nam Hyung Won, Yu Seung Kim, Guisik Kwon, Dokyeong Hsu, Chih-Chung Lin, Chia-Hsiang Huang, Yuanfei Sun, Xiaopeng Lu, Wen Li, Jie Gao, Xinbo Bell-Kligler, Sefi Computer Vision Lab ETH Zurich Indian Institute Of Technology Madras India Image Communication & Signal Processing Laboratory Hanyang University Seoul Korea Republic of CVML Chung-Ang University Department Management Information Systems National Pingtung University of Science and Technology Department of Electrical Engineering National Cheng-Kung University Xidian University Weizmann Institute of Science Israel

This paper reviews the AIM 2019 challenge on real world super-resolution. It focuses on the participating methods and final results. The challenge addresses the real world setting, where paired true high and low-resolution images are unavailable. For training, only one set of source input images is therefore provided in the challenge. In Track 1: Source Domain the aim is to super-resolve such images while preserving the low level image characteristics of the source input domain. In Track 2: Target Domain a set of high-quality images is also provided for training, that defines the output domain and desired quality of the superresolved images. To allow for quantitative evaluation, the source input images in both tracks are constructed using artificial, but realistic, image degradations. The challenge is the first of its kind, aiming to advance the state-of-the-art and provide a standard benchmark for this newly emerging task. In total 7 teams competed in the final testing phase, demonstrating new and innovative solutions to the problem. Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Optical resolving power

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Deep learning methods for lung cancer segmentation in whole-slide histopathology images - The ACDC@lungHP challenge 2019

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Li, Zhang Zhang, Jiehua Tan, Tao Teng, Xichao Sun, Xiaoliang Li, Yang Liu, Lihong Xiao, Yang Lee, Byungjae Li, Yilong Zhang, Qianni Sun, Shujiao Zheng, Yushan Yan, Junyu Li, Ni Hong, Yiyu Ko, Junsu Jung, Hyun Liu, Yanling Chen, Yu-Cheng Wang, Ching-Wei Yurovskiy, Vladimir Maevskikh, Pavel Khanagha, Vahid Jiang, Yi Feng, Xiangjun Liu, Zhihong Li, Daiqiang Schüffler, Peter J. Yu, Qifeng Chen, Hui Tang, Yuling Litjens, Geert College of Aerospace Science and Engineering National University of Defense Technology Changsha410073 China Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Eindhoven University of Technology Netherlands and ScreenPoint Medical Eindhoven Nijmegen5600 MB Netherlands Pingan Technology Shenzhen China Lunit Inc. Seoul Korea Republic of School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Queen Mary University of London London United Kingdom Image Processing Center School of Astronautics Beihang University Beijing102206 China Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering Beijing100191 China Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering Beihang University Image Processing Center School of Astronautics Beihang University Beijing102206 China AstLab School of Automatationm Beihang University Beijing China Department of R&D Center Arontier Co. Ltd. Seoul Korea Republic of Frederick National Laboratory United States Center of Computer Vision and Medical Imaging Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering Graduate institute of Applied Science and Technology National Taiwan University of Science and Technology AI Explore Taipei Taiwan Research Department Sky-chain Global Yekaterinburg Russia Audio Solutions Team Motorola Solutions Inc. PlantationFL United States Second Xiangya Hospital Central South University Changsha China Hunan Biotechnology Ltd. Changsha China Hunan Cancer Hospital Central South University Changsha China Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center United States First Hospital of Changsha City Changsha China Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Netherlands

Accurate segmentation of lung cancer in pathology slides is a critical step in improving patient care. We proposed the ACDC@LungHP (Automatic Cancer Detection and Classification in Whole-slide Lung Histopathology) challenge for evaluating different computer-aided diagnosis (CADs) methods on the automatic diagnosis of lung cancer. The ACDC@LungHP 2019 focused on segmentation (pixel-wise detection) of cancer tissue in whole slide imaging (WSI), using an annotated dataset of 150 training images and 50 test images from 200 patients. This paper reviews this challenge and summarizes the top 10 submitted methods for lung cancer segmentation. All methods were evaluated using the false positive rate, false negative rate, and DICE coefficient (DC). The DC ranged from 0.7354±0.1149 to 0.8372±0.0858. The DC of the best method was close to the inter-observer agreement (0.8398±0.0890). All methods were based on deep learning and categorized into two groups: multi-model method and single model method. In general, multi-model methods were significantly better (p Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Biological organs

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Radiomics analysis of baseline F-FDG PET/CT images for improved prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma 15

Radiomics analysis of baseline F-FDG PET/CT images for impro...

引用

15th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI 2018

作者： Lv, Wenbing Yuan, Qingyu Wang, Quanshi Ma, Jianhua Feng, Qianjin Chen, Wufan Rahmim, Arman Lu, Lijun School of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing Southern Medical University China Nanfang PET Center Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University China Department of Radiology Johns Hopkins University United States Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Johns Hopkins University United States

ISBN: (纸本)9781538636367

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic performance of radiomics features on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients imaged with baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT. 128 NPC patients were retrospectively enrolled with 3348 radiomics features and 13 clinical features. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), and log-rank test was used to screen the significant features. Cox proportional hazards regression modal with forward stepwise feature selection was adopted to identify independent predictors of PFS. 24 radiomics features and 8 clinical features were found to be significantly associated with PFS in univariate analysis. Radiomics features HGZE-GLSZM-HLL-32 (p=0.0061, HR: 0.66, 95%CI: 0.49-0.89), as well as clinical features N-stage, M-stage, antibody VCA-IgA and platelet count (PLT) retained the independent prognostic significance for PFS in multivariate analysis. Overall, radiomics features can provide complementary prognostic information for NPC patients imaged with baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to clinical features. © 2018 IEEE.

关键词： Multivariant analysis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study Group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 3 — Ex vivo imaging: data processing, comparisons with microscopy, and tractography

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Schilling, Kurt G. Howard, Amy F.D. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio van de Looij, Yohan Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Dell' Acqua, Flavio Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Johnson, G. Allan Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Jelescu, Ileana O. Radiology and Radiological Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTN United States Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Department of Bioengineering Imperial College London London United Kingdom FMRIB Centre Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Res

Preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) has proven value in methods development and validation, characterizing the biological basis of diffusion phenomena, and comparative anatomy. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages that facilitate high spatial resolution and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) images, cutting-edge diffusion contrasts, and direct comparison with histological data as a methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work concludes a 3-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. Herein, we describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on image pre-processing, data processing and model fitting, and tractography. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. We end by providing guidelines on code sharing and data sharing, and point towards open-source software and databases specific to small animal and ex vivo imaging. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Data Sharing

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

NTIRE 2020 Challenge on Real-World image Super-Resolution: Methods and Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Lugmayr, Andreas Danelljan, Martin Timofte, Radu Ahn, Namhyuk Bai, Dongwoon Cai, Jie Cao, Yun Chen, Junyang Cheng, Kaihua Chun, SeYoung Deng, Wei El-Khamy, Mostafa Man Ho, Chiu Ji, Xiaozhong Kheradmand, Amin Kim, Gwantae Ko, Hanseok Lee, Kanghyu Lee, Jungwon Li, Hao Liu, Ziluan Liu, Zhi-Song Liu, Shuai Lu, Yunhua Meng, Zibo Navarrete Michelini, Pablo Micheloni, Christian Prajapati, Kalpesh Ren, Haoyu Hyeok Seo, Yong Siu, Wan-Chi Sohn, Kyung-Ah Tai, Ying Muhammad Umer, Rao Wang, Shuangquan Wang, Huibing Haoning Wu, Timothy Wu, Haoning Yang, Biao Yang, Fuzhi Yoo, Jaejun Zhao, Tongtong Zhou, Yuanbo Zhuo, Haijie Zong, Ziyao Zou, Xueyi Wang, Li-Wen Cani, Marie-Paule Siu, Wan-Chi Yang, Huan Fu, Jianlong Shi, Yukai Chen, Junyang Lee, Kanghyu Park, Jaihyun Lee, Junyeop Min, Jeongki Lee, Bokyeung Ko, Hanseok Yoo, Jaejun Sohn, Kyung-Ah Micheloni, Christian Hu, Fengshuo Wang, Yanhong Lu, Yunhua Peng, Jinjia Wang, Huibing Zhuo, Haijie Lee, Junyeop Min, Jeongki Lee, Bokyeung Park, Jaihyun Ko, Hanseok Tai, Lab Ying Jilin Li, Youtu Lab Liu, Shuai Yang, Biao Liu, Xing Chen, Shuaijun Zhao, Lei Wang, Zhan Lin, Yuxuan Jia, Xu Gao, Qinquan Deng, Wei Kheradmand, Amin El-Khamy, Mostafa Wang, Shuangquan Bai, Dongwoon Lee, Jungwon Patel, Heena Chudasama, Vishal Upla, Kishor Ramachandra, Raghavendra Raja, Kiran Busch, Christoph Meng, Zibo Ho, Chiu Man Computer Vision Lab ETH Zurich Switzerland LIX - Computer science laboratory at the cole polytechnique Palaiseau France Center of Multimedia Signal Processing Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong Shanghai Jiao Tong University China Microsoft Research Beijing China Guangdong University of Technology China Intelligent Signal Processing Laboratory Korea University Korea Republic of Ajou University Korea Republic of EPFL University of Udine Italy BOE Technology Group Co. Ltd Dalian Maritime University China Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd Department of Video Information Processing Korea University Korea Republic of School of Electrical Engineering Korea University Korea Republic of Tencent Youtu Lab Yun Cao Tencent Youtu Tencent Youtu Lab Chengjie Wang Tencent Tencent Youtu Lab Feiyue Huang Tencent Youtu Lab Peking University China North China University of Technology China Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd China Fuzhou University Tong Tong Fuzhou University Imperial Vision Technology China Fuzhou University Imperial Vision Technology China Imperial Vision Technology SOC R&D Samsung Semiconductor Inc. United States Ulsan national institute of science and technology Korea Republic of Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute Of Technology Surat India Norwegian University of Science and Technology Gjøvik Norway InnoPeak Technology

This paper reviews the NTIRE 2020 challenge on real world super-resolution. It focuses on the participating methods and final results. The challenge addresses the real world setting, where paired true high and low-resolution images are unavailable. For training, only one set of source input images is therefore provided along with a set of unpaired high-quality target images. In Track 1: image processing artifacts, the aim is to super-resolve images with synthetically generated image processing artifacts. This allows for quantitative benchmarking of the approaches w.r.t. a ground-truth image. In Track 2: Smartphone images, real low-quality smart phone images have to be super-resolved. In both tracks, the ultimate goal is to achieve the best perceptual quality, evaluated using a human study. This is the second challenge on the subject, following AIM 2019, targeting to advance the state-of-the-art in super-resolution. To measure the performance we use the benchmark protocol from AIM 2019. In total 22 teams competed in the final testing phase, demonstrating new and innovative solutions to the problem. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Optical resolving power

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：