检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 62-68页

作者： DONAHUE, JC MCMAHON, EJ NELSON, LW Commander John C. Donahue USN:is the Deputy Technical Director for NAVSEA PMS 399 the FFG 7 class Acquisition Project Office. In addition he is the FFG 7 class Fin Stabilizer System Program Manager. Cdr. Donahue is an Engineering Duty Officer and Surface Warfare Officer who holds a BS in marine engineering from the California Maritime Academy a BS in business administration and an MS in material management from the Naval Postgraduate School. He is a designated Weapons Systems Acquisition Manager. Cdr. Donahue's sea service includes three tours culminating as chief engineer in USSFarragut (DLG-6) during that ship's complex overhaul as the DLG pilot ship for the 1200 PSI improvement program. Significant shore duty includes the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard where he served as theBelknapproject officer during that ship's repair restoration and modernization following its collision with USSJohn F. Kennedy (CV-67) Assistant Sixth Fleet Maintenance Officer and the Naval Research Laboratory. Cdr. Donahue was the charter president of the ASNE Section at the Naval Postgraduate School. Edward J. McMahon:is founder and President Reliability Sciences Incorporated (RSI) and has been supporting NAVSEA on the FFG 7 Class fin stabilizer system procurement since 1977. Mr. McMahon has a BSME from New Jersey Institute of Technology and has done graduate work in electrical engineering operations research and engineering administration at New Jersey Institute of Technology Seton Hall University University of Alabama and George Washington University. He has authored and presented various papers on reliability and electrostatic discharge control and coauthored a book Electrostatic Discharge Control — Successful Methods for Microelectronics Design and Manufacturingpublished by Hayden Publishing Company 1983. Mr. McMahon is a registered Professional Engineer and listed in Who's Who 1977 1978 1982 and 1983. Louis W. Nelson:is an electrical engineer with the NAVSEA Surface Ship Control and Hydraulic System Branch where he ha

This paper discusses the new fin stabilizer system developed for the FFG 7 class ships. The paper includes: a brief history of fin stabilizers, the advantages of fin stabilizers on Navy combatants, brief theory of system operation, the approaches used in system development, and an up to date program status. This paper furthers Nelson and McCallum's paper [1] which addresses the infancy of the FFG 7 fin stabilizer system development program.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

EXPERIENCES WITH REVERSE-OSMOSIS DESALINATION ABOARD USS FLETCHER

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 69-75页

作者： ADAMSON, WL PIZZINO, JF SMITH, W Wayne L. Adamson:received his BS and MS degrees in mechanical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1962 and 1966 respectively and his MS degree in governmental administration from the George Washington University in 1969. He has been employed at the David W Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center Annapolis Maryland since 1957 and presently conducts research and development in shipboard auxiliary machinery including desalination and water recovery equipment heat exchangers and steam condensers. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Maryland and in addition to ASNE which he joined in 1967 he is a member of ASME. Joseph F. Pizzino:received his BS degree in chemical engineering from the University of Maryland in 1970 and his MS degree in chemical engineering from The Catholic University of America in 1978. He has been employed at the David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center Annapolis Maryland since 1971 and is currently involved in the development of reverse osmosis for shipboard desalination and liferaft emergency desalination. In addition to ASNE which he joined in 1974 he is a member of AIChE. Wilbur L. Smith:received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute in 1962 and has done graduate work at Pennsylvania State University and George Washington University in automatic control theory and systems engineering. His career with the U.S. Navy started at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard in 1962 as a designer of hydraulic systems. He worked for the Naval Boiler and Turbine Laboratory as a boiler control system engineer from 1964 until 1968. Since then he has been employed by the Naval Sea Systems Command and is currently head of the Heat Exchanger Branch Code 56X23.

As part of a program to develop reverse osmosis (RO) desalination systems for shipboard freshwater production, the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center worked with the Naval Sea systems Command to install a 12,000 gal/day, two-stage RO plant aboard USS Fletcher (DD 992) in 1981. The first stage provides potable water (less than 500 parts/million total dissolved solids) for crew needs; the second stage provides high purity water (less than 2 parts/million of total dissolved solids) for boiler makeup. The plant has been producing acceptable water quality and quantity despite some materials related problems. The system design has proven to be well suited for minimizing manning and maintenance requirements. A 12,000 gal/day “ship quality” RO system is now under contract to meet Navy needs for a reliable, minimum weight and volume, low energy desalination plant for future surface ships. The preproduction plant will be required to meet stringent reliability requirements as well as shock, vibration, and noise specifications as part of the process for obtaining approval for full production. This paper describes the technology developments necessary to achieve the present naval performance levels and discusses plans for future applications.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

FUTURE PROPULSION MACHINERY TECHNOLOGY FOR GAS-TURBINE POWERED FRIGATES, DESTROYERS, AND CRUISERS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第2期96卷 34-46页

作者： BASKERVILLE, JE QUANDT, ER DONOVAN, MR USN The Authors Commander James E. Baskerville USNis presently assigned to Naval Sea Systems Command (NA VSEA) as the Ship Design Manager for the DDG 51 the Navy's next generation surface combatant. A graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy Class of 1969 he is a qualified Surface Warfare Officer and designated Engineering Duty Officer (ED). He received his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering and his professional degree of Ocean Engineer from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and holds a patent right on an Electronic Control and Response System. His naval assignments include tours in USSRamsey (FFG-2) Aide and Flag Lieutenant to the Commander Naval Electronic Systems Command and Ship Superintendent Surface Type Desk Officer and Assistant Design Superintendent at NA VSHIPYD Pearl Harbor. He was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal for distinguished performance at Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard. As an author he has contributed articles to the ASNEJournaland given presentations at local sections on ship design the use of innovative technology in ship repair and maintenance and the costs and risks associated with engineering progress. Commander Baskerville is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Virginia an adjunct professor teaching marine engineering at Virginia Tech. and in addition to ASNE which he joined in 1975 is a member of SNAME Tau Beta Pi Sigma Xi ASME and the American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). Dr. Earl R. Quandt:received his degree of Chemical Engineer from the University of Cincinnati in 1956 and his Ph.D. degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1961. He worked in the naval reactors program at the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory from 1956 to 1963. Since that time he has been with David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center Annapolis Maryland where he is Head of the Power Systems Division. He contributed to this paper while on a one year assignment to the U.S. Naval Academy as V

A turning point occurred in naval engineering in 1972 when the U.S. N avy chose to use marine gas turbines for the propulsion of its new SPRUANCE and PERRY Class ships. This paper reviews the more than twenty years of experience with turbine technology and its design integration into combat ships needed to make that decision. It is concluded that the availability of a good second generation aircraft derivative engine with proven reliability and a strong commercial base, i.e., the LM-2500, was as important to the decision as was the predicted improved ship effectiveness and cost benefits. This paper discusses improvements that can be made to the twin engine, single gear, single propeller shaft system. Focusing only on this mechanical transmission concept, it addresses the impact of possible improvements to the engine, gear, and shafting. In particular, the paper discusses current LM-2500 related R&D efforts to: (a) obtain improved part-power fuel rates, (b) integrate with a reversing reduction gear, and (c) add on a waste heat recovery steam cycle. Looking ahead to the year 2000, this paper suggests that a successor to the ubiquitous LM-2500 will appear in the 15 MW power range to provide the next step in the evolution of the twin engine package. This new naval engine will most likely be based on an aircraft core that exists at present, such that it will have demonstrated its reliability and commercial potential through many hours of testing prior to its mid-1990 marine conversion. This new engine is expected to offer improved air flow, an excellent fuel rate (approaching a flat 0.30 LB/HP-HR), and effective maintenance monitoring, all at some expense in size, weight, and cost. The year 2000 engine will burn a liquid hydrocarbon fuel similar to JP-5 because of its aircraft origins. Combined with advances in gear and shafting technology, the full twin engine propulsion system of the year 2000 should be markedly lighter, smaller, and more efficient than today's units.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

DESIGN FOR NEW-JERSEY, IOWA, AND DES-MOINES MODERNIZATION

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 25-38页

作者： SIMS, PJ EDWARDS, JR DICKEY, RL SHULL, HS Philip J. Sims:graduated from Webb Institute in 1971 and went to work for the Advance Design Branch of the Naval Ship Engineering Center. He was part of the FFG-7 design team in 1972. The 1973–75 years were spent developing automated early-stage aircraft carrier design procedures and performing carrier design trade-off work in support of the CVV design. He returned to school in 1976 for a masters at M.I. T. The 1977–80 period was spent updating the Navy's destroyer-cruiser early-stage design procedures and performing studies for the CGN-42 reserve FFX and DDX (later DDG 51) projects. Also during this period he was team leader on concept formulation (CONFORM) studies of new ships such as a heavy combatant and a low detectability ship. From 1981 to early 1983 Mr. Sims was Design Integration Manager for the BB-62 and Ship Design Manager for the BB-61 and CA-134. He is presently principal naval architect for the FFX study and also works on the NA TO frigate effort. James F. Edwards Sr:.is the Technical Director Ship Analytics Inc. Washington D.C. Operations and was the Ship Design Manager for the battleship USSNew Jerseyprior to his departure from NAVSEA in August 1983. He joined the U.S. Navy Reserves in 1954 and served on active duty from 1957 to 1960. From 1961 to 1963 he worked for McLaughlin Research Corporation as a section head in the drafting department. From 1963 to 1966 he worked for the Vitro Corporation of America in the Terrier (surface missile systems) Department. In 1966 he participated in the contract design of the first shipboard integrated digital ASW Command and Control system while working for the Stanwick Corporation. In 1967 Mr. Edwards accepted a position at NAVSHIPS in the Combat System Integration Division. In 1974 he transferred to what is currently NAVSEA's Hull Design Division. In 1980 Mr. Edwards was designated as the Battleship and Heavy Cruiser General Arrangements Task Leader and subsequently served as the Hull Task Group Manager the Ship Configuration Control Manager and fina

In reactivating the battleship New Jersey , the Navy faced three major problems. The baseline data on the ship was not readily available or reliable, a new generation cruise missile armament was proposed, and the ship delivery schedule was very tight. After doing a feasibility study, system design engineers were taken onboard the mothballed ship to resolve the design problems. Being on the ship allowed an intensive effort and immediate reference to the actual ship configuration. The tools used to control this effort were a ship check plan, a ship check form and the master arrangement drawing. Simultaneously with the design effort, a repair scoping effort was conducted. The design evolution and solutions to the major problems are described. The results of the New Jersey effort are shown with sample documentation, the ship characteristics and the downstream design effort. The Iowa was the next ship to be modernized. The top level requirements were the same as New Jersey's but new problems were encountered. More options were investigated which diverted attention from the basic effort. A fundamental difference was the Iowa had not had a 1968 reactivation as the New Jersey had, so items that were repair and reactivation on the New Jersey in 1968 had to be part of the Iowa modernization. A major influence on the Iowa design process was that a complete set of specifications for a private yard bid had to be developed. The next effort was to install the same New Jersey modernization payload on a Des Moines class heavy cruiser. Heavy cruisers are large ships but significantly smaller than battleships and much closer to their naval architectural limits of weight and center of gravity. They have much less topside area than the battleships, and the new payload was very topside space consuming. The cruisers are also much more restricted in internal volume. Two feasibility studies were conducted. One resolved volume problems but approached the weight and center of gravity limits.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED MARINE VEHICLES FOR EXPRESS SHIPPING

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第3期95卷 283-300页

作者： LUEDEKE, G FARNHAM, RB JR. George Luedeke Jr.: received his BS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his MS degree in Product Design from Illinois Institute of Technology. Early in his career Mr. Luedeke joined General Motors Corporation as a designer responsible for development of people mover and rail rapid transit systems. From 1964 to 1974 he was with Hughes Aircraft Company. At Hughes he performed analyses and developed designs for a wide variety of program and proposal efforts such as: High Speed Ground Transportation (DOT) Task Force Command Center (NAVY) Panama Canal Marine Traffic Control Center (Panama Canal Co.) Royal Iranian Navy Command Center (Iran) Tactical Information Processing and Interpretation Center (Air Force) and WALLEYE CONDOR and PHOENIX Missile Systems (NAVY). He also had marketing development responsibilities related to the diversification of Hughes resources in civil business areas such as: Automatic train control (WMATA BARTD SCRTD) water/sewage treatment plant automation (Santa Clara County) Aqueduct Control (SWR) Hydrometeorological data collection (BPA WMO) and Salton Sea basin systems analysis (Dept. of the Interior). He was responsible for combat system integration for the Hughes 2000T Surface Effect Ship (SES) proposal. He also conducted detailed studies concerning ship flexure for the Improved Point Defense Target Acquisition System Program and for the definition of operational High Energy Laser weapon installations on a series of conventional monohulls (DLG DD and CVN). Since 1974 Mr. Luedeke has been employed at RMI Inc. (formerly Rohr Marine Inc.). During this time he has held several positions. His responsibilities have included directing a number of studies on advanced SES concepts managing activities defining mission/cost effectiveness of military and commercial SES's including defining the operational benefits and enhanced survivability characteristics of cargo SES's for high speed military sealiftfor NA TO and Southeast Asia

This paper will present the results of a marketing, engineering, and economic analysis of advanced marine vehicles done by IMA Resources, Inc. and RMI, Inc., in support of a Maritime Administration project to study “Multimode Express Shipping”. The study was conducted in 1981 and examined the economic benefits of using advanced marine vehicles as express cargo vessels in domestic and international service. Commodity characteristics, desirable express carrier rates, and potential high payoff service and route alternatives were identified. Advanced marine vehicles were surveyed and sized to meet desirable deadweight and block speed objectives. The costs of operating these craft on a variety of trade routes were calculated using an advanced marine vehicle economic analysis program. Revenues, expenses, break-even, profit and loss, cash flow requirements, tax summary and economic indicators (i.e., cost/ton – mile, etc.) were projected over the expected life of the vehicles as was return on investment. Traffic density and market penetration considerations narrowed the field of choice to smaller sized advanced marine vehicle carriers (i.e., 50 and 250 ton deadweight) and to three international and five domestic routes.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SHIPBOARD MAIN BOILER AND FEED PUMP control-SYSTEM ONLINE ALIGNMENT VERIFICATION

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1982年第6期94卷 39-46页

作者： BANHAM, JW ADAM, DJ James W. Banham:holds positions both as Director of the Machinery Automation Systems Department of the Naval Ship Systems Engineering Station and as Assistant Chairman of the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department of Drexel University's Evening College where he holds the rank of Adjunct Associate Professor. He is the author of a text on Numerical Methods Applications in Engineering. In addition to numerous technical papers he is also the author of the ISA film on Boiler Feedwater Control Systems. A registered professional engineer in the state of Pennsylvania Mr. Banham is co-author of a forthcoming handbook on preparing for the Professional Engineering Examination in mechanical engineering. Mr. Banham holds a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering from the Pennsylvania State University his graduate studies were taken at the University of Pennsylvania. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Instrument Society of America. He served as a member of the ISA Education Committee from 1964 through 1973 and as a member of the ISA Power Plant Dynamics Committee since 1969. His service on the latter committee includes terms as Executive Secretary Vice-Chairman and Chairman. Among other honors Mr. Banham was the winner of the Naval Ship Engineering Center's first Technical Achievement Award (1963) Technical Publication Award (1974) and Equal Employment Opportunity Award (1978). He was also the recipient of Drexel University's Laura S. Campbell Award for Excellence in Teaching (1978). He has taught undergraduate courses in classical control theory numerical methods computer programming systems design and analysis and instrumentation. He also teaches systems theory and computer science in an EIT Review and heat transfer in a PE Review conducted by the Drexel University Department of Continuing Professional Education. Mr. David J. Adam:is a Project Engineer in the Naval Sea Systems Command (PMS301) Steam Propulsion Plant Improvement Program where he i

One of the most serious problems encountered in Naval steam plants following World War II was the unreliable performance of boiler and main feedpump pneumatic control systems. In addition to control component and system design deficiencies, these control systems suffered from inadequate methods to measure and adjust system alignment. This paper describes the development of a set of procedures for on-line alignment verification (OLV) of pneumatic main boiler and feedpump control systems. The procedures are designed for use by N avy control system technicians and, in addition to on-line alignment verification, provide guidance for troubleshooting and for performing system alignment. Procedure static checks measure steady state steaming performance and OLV procedure dynamic checks measure the ability of the boiler and control systems to respond to load changes. The paper describes typical control system characteristics that influence OLV procedure content and the supporting analysis that was used to establish alignment criteria ranges that satisfy both steady state and transient performance requirements. Also described is the alignment criteria tolerance analysis along with the steps involved in a typical OLV check procedure development. Descriptions of the various OLV checks, troubleshooting procedures and alignment procedures are provided. Typical shipboard implementation requirements are described and experience to date with the procedures is provided along with a status report on OLV procedure implementations.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

IS AUTOMATION THE MAGIC POTION FOR MANNING PROBLEMS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1982年第2期94卷 127-136页

作者： MELLIS, JG PLATO, AI REIN, RJ James G. Mellis:attended Central Institute in Kansas City Mo. where he graduated in Electronic Engineering Technology. He later attended the University of Minn. in Minneapolis. At present he works in the Manning and Controls Integration Section of the Naval Sea Systems Command. Mr. Mellis is responsible for developing manpower requirements for ship design and for the coordination of shipboard automation designs with the U.S. Navy's manpower policies and availability. Mr. Mellis is currently developing manpower requirements for the U.S. Navy's DDGX ship design. In this capacity he has examined proposals for shipboard manpower reductions through the use of automation and remote control techniques. Another project where Mr. Mellis is heavily engaged in is the Ship Systems Engineering Standards (SSES) development. Mr. Mellis is the assistant project manager for the test and evaluation and producibility aspects of the SSES project. Previously prior to his employment with NAVSEA Mr. Mellis worked for General Dynamics/Electronic Division as a Senior Field Engineer on the Apollo Instrumentation Ships (i.e. Vanguard Restone Mercury). He was responsible for Central Data Processing Systems on the three ships. Artis I. Plato:is the Head of the Manning and Controls Integration Section of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). He is responsible for the development of accurate manpower requirements for all new construction and major overhaul ship projects for the U.S. NAVY. In addition Mr. Plato must coordinate shipboard controls integration and automation aspects with manpower requirements to insure that a compatible solution is developed. Mr. Plato began his professional career in 1956 at the New York Naval Shipyard. There he worked in the Internal Combustion Engine and Shipboard Elevator Section. During 1957 and 1958 he was called up for active duty with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He served in Europe with various Construction Engineers units. After release from active duty he returned to the shipyard. In 19

This paper examines the recent experience in the UNITED STATES NAVY where automation has been introduced into new ship designs. While other attributes are recognized in the introduction of automated shipboard systems, such as the ability to respond more quickly in combat situations, this paper focuses on the effects of automation upon ship manpower requirements. Specific examples show that expected reductions in manning were not achieved in recent ship designs where automation was incorporated for that purpose. While the use of shipboard automation is not without its critics, the U.S. Fleet appears to have accepted the concept. User feedback addresses the issues of reliability, the provisions for backup systems, the need for better qualified personnel and the concern about maintenance workload. The authors provide specific recommendations for improved guidance to ship designers to more effectively apply automation in the ship design process.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

OPTIMIZATION OF FEEDBACK-systems WITH CONSTRAINED INFORMATION-FLOW

引用

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF systems SCIENCE 1981年第12期12卷 1459-1468页

作者： YANCHEVSKY, AE HIRVONEN, VJ Systems Theory Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology SF-02150 Espoo 15 Otaniemi Finland Division of Automation and Control Processes of Lcningrad Electrical Engineering Institute 197022 Russian Federation

Linear quadratic optimization problem of discrete time feedback systems with constrained feedback information flow is studied. Two cases of non-structural and structural feedback constraints are considered and corresponding optimal system synthesis procedures are derived. The approach presents a general solution to the problem of feasibleoptimal decentralized control systems synthesis with state feedbacks. © 1981 Taylor & Francis Ltd.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SYSTEM engineering STATE-OF-ART EQUAL TO MODERN WARSHIP DESIGN

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1978年第2期90卷 130-136页

作者： ECKHART, M USN (RET.) The Authoris currently Chief Scientist in the Autonetics Marine Systems Division Rockwell International concentrating in Digital Simulation Applications in System Engineering. A graduate of the U. S. Naval Academy in 1945 he served in various surface assignments until 1950. Subsequent thereto after being designated an Engineering Duty Officer (ED) he had Type Commander Staff Laboratory ESO and Naval Shipyard assignments until 1962 when he became the Miltary Chairman Electrical Science at the U. S. Naval Academy. In 1965 he became the Head Electrical/Electronics Design Branch Bureau of Ships remaining in this assignment until 1967 when he assumed the responsibilities of Director Ship Concept Design Division Naval Ship Engineering Center. Upon retiring from the U. S. Naval Service in 1970 he joined Rockewell International and the following year became the Manager of the Integration Programs Group involved in Model—Based Systems Analysis EM Effectiveness Submarine Control and Ship Data Miltiplexing. His education includes a BS degree from the U. S. Naval Academy a BS degree in Electrical Engineering received from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1949 and a MS degree in Electrical Engineering received from The George Washington University in 1967. A former ASNE Council Member he has been active in ASNE at both the National and Local Section levels since 1967.

The general systems engineering state—of—the—art has not been equal to the functional diversity of modern multimission warships, nor to the more complex system relationships that are characteristically involved in their design. Resultant dependence upon qualitative assessments of higher level relationships in warship definition and design has been and is a critical impediment to the Navy's corporate purposes, both in prosecuting its vital rebuilding campaign and in dealing with the technological pace of naval warfare. A design methodology development, first reported on ASNE Day 74, has provided the basis for removing this impediment. The threshold criterion of system engineering, quantification, and correlation of total system design objectives, can be satisfied for warship definition and design. Further, the basic elements of an exploitive system engineering practice have been developed sufficiently to confirm their validity. This work is interpreted in terms of the system engineering structure that can be expected to emerge; first, because it can be done, and second, because its payoffs are so urgently needed by the Navy.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A COGAS PROPULSION PLANT

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1977年第6期89卷 19-34页

作者： ABBOTT, JACK W. McINTIRE, JOHN G. RUBIS, C. JOSEPH Mr. Jack W. Abbott:is Head of the Systems Engineering and Analysis Branch Ship Design Division Naval Ship Engineering Center. He received his BSME degree from Stanford University in 1960 and his ME A degree from The George Washington University in 1975. He is a Lieutenant Commander USNR (Ret.) having served during his active duty period as Engineering Officer aboard a U. S. destroyer for 3 years and also a registered Professional Engineer in the State of California. In addition to holding several U.S. Patents he annually instructs courses in the Design of Naval Surface Ships at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology including the concept of total energy systems. He is a member of SNAME and has been a member of ASNE and a frequent contributor to the Journal since 1966 most recently having been a co—recipient of the “Jimmie Hamilton” Award for the best paper published in 1976. Mr. John G. Mclntire:received his BS and MS degrees from the University of California at Berkeley where he did his graduate studies in the field of Automatic Control Systems Design. He was employed by the Naval Ship Engineering Center in 1971 as a Mechanical Engineer and is currently serving as Acting Head of the Machinery Control Systems Section Machinery Systems Division. He is a member of the NA VAIR/NA VSEA Association of Scientists and Engineers the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the National Society of Professional Engineers. Mr. C. Joseph Rubls:isPresident of Propulsion Dynamics Inc. Annapolis Md. where he is engaged in simulation and analytical studies of ship propulsion and automation systems. Previous to his present position he was a Scientific Consultant and Head of the Control Systems Branch David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research & Development Center Annapolis Laboratory where he was employed over a 10–year period. His other employment experience includes the Martin—Marietta Company as Senior Systems Engineer for Guidance Radar and for Communications Systems the U.S. Naval Academy American Universi

The paper provides a dynamic analysis of a COGAS Propulsion Plant, including mathematical modeling and simulation, and concludes with the results of a COGAS simulation which indicates encouraging conclusions regarding...

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：