检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

An Automatic Test Case Generation Method based on SysML Activity Diagram

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2019年第5期563卷

作者： Yiqun Xu Linbo Wu MoE Engineering Center for Software/Hardware Co-Design Technology and Application East China Normal University Shanghai 200062 China Institute of Computer Application Research Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics Mianyang 621000 China

Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is a new method to engineer the modern large, complex systems. MBSE has a good guarantee for system reliability and it can improve the efficiency of system development. So, MBSE has received extensive attention from academia and industry. SysML is an auxiliary language for MBSE. SysML activity diagram can model the behavior of the system. In this paper, we use SysML activity diagram to generate test case. There are two main things in our work. One is that we have designed an automated SysML activity diagram test case generation method. Second, we develop a test case generation tool to support related applications in the industry.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Measurement of the τ lepton polarization in Z boson decays in proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.)

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2024年第1期2024卷 101页

作者： Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J.W. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Escalante Del Valle, A. Hussain, P.S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Templ, S. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Darwish, M.R. Janssen, T. Van Mechelen, P. Bols, E.S. D’Hondt, J. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. El Faham, H. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Müller, D. Sahasransu, A.R. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Clerbaux, B. De Lentdecker, G. Favart, L. Hohov, D. Jaramillo, J. Khalilzadeh, A. Lee, K. Mahdavikhorrami, M. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Pétré, L. Postiau, N. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Hong, Y. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Mestdach, G. Rendón, C. Samalan, A. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. Delaere, C. Donertas, I.S. Giammanco, A. Jaffel, K. Jain, Sa. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Mondal, K. Tran, T.T. Wertz, S. Alves, G.A. Coelho, E. Hensel, C. Menezes De Oliveira, T. Moraes, A. Rebello Teles, P. Soeiro, M. Aldá Júnior, W.L. Alves Gallo Pereira, M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E.M. Da Silveira, G.G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Martins, J. Mora Herrera, C. Mota Amarilo, K. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Santoro, A. Silva Do Amaral, S.M. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Vilela Pereira, A. Bernardes, C.A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T.R. Gregores, E.M. Mercadante, P.G. Novaes, S.F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Ivanov, T. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Guo, Q. Javaid, T. Mittal, M. Yuan, L. Bauer, G. Hu, Z. Yi, K. Chen, G.M. Chen, H.S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C.H. Kapoor, A. Liao, H. Liu, Z.-A. Monti, F. Sharma, R. Song, J.N. Tao, J. Wang, C. Wang, J. Wang, Z. Zhang, H. Agapitos, A. Ban, Y. Lev Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) — Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Zhejiang Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU) Fayoum University El-Fayoum Egypt National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tallinn Estonia Department of Physics

The polarization of τ leptons is measured using leptonic and hadronic τ lepton decays in Z → τ+ τ− events in proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.) recorded by CMS at the CERN LHC with an integrated lum... 详细信息

The polarization of τ leptons is measured using leptonic and hadronic τ lepton decays in Z → τ⁺ τ⁻ events in proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.) recorded by CMS at the CERN LHC with an integrated luminosity of 36.3 fb⁻¹. The measured τ⁻ lepton polarization at the Z boson mass pole is P_τ(Z) = −0.144 ± 0.006 (stat) ± 0.014 (syst) = −0.144 ± 0.015, in good agreement with the measurement of the τ lepton asymmetry parameter of A_τ = 0.1439 ± 0.0043 = − P_τ(Z) at LEP. The τ lepton polarization depends on the ratio of the vector to axial-vector couplings of the τ leptons in the neutral current expression, and thus on the effective weak mixing angle sin² θWeff , independently of the Z boson production mechanism. The obtained value sin² θWeff = 0.2319 ± 0.0008(stat) ± 0.0018(syst) = 0.2319 ± 0.0019 is in good agreement with measurements at e⁺ e⁻ colliders. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]. © 2024, The Author(s).

关键词： Hadron-Hadron Scattering Tau Physics

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A fine-grained data set and analysis of tangling in bug fixing commits

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Herbold, Steffen Trautsch, Alexander Ledel, Benjamin Aghamohammadi, Alireza Ghaleb, Taher Ahmed Chahal, Kuljit Kaur Bossenmaier, Tim Nagaria, Bhaveet Makedonski, Philip Ahmadabadi, Matin Nili Szabados, Kristof Spieker, Helge Madeja, Matej Hoy, Nathaniel G. Lenarduzzi, Valentina Wang, Shangwen Rodríguez-Pérez, Gema Colomo-Palacios, Ricardo Verdecchia, Roberto Singh, Paramvir Qin, Yihao Chakroborti, Debasish Davis, Willard Walunj, Vijay Wu, Hongjun Marcilio, Diego Alam, Omar Aldaeej, Abdullah Amit, Idan Turhan, Burak Eismann, Simon Wickert, Anna-Katharina Malavolta, Ivano Sulír, Matúš Fard, Fatemeh Henley, Austin Z. Kourtzanidis, Stratos Tuzun, Eray Treude, Christoph Shamasbi, Simin Maleki Pashchenko, Ivan Wyrich, Marvin Davis, James C. Serebrenik, Alexander Albrecht, Ella Aktas, Ethem Utku Strüber, Daniel Erbel, Johannes Institute for Software and Systems Engineering TU Clausthal Clausthal-Zellefeld Germany Institute of Computer Science University of Goettingen Goettingen Germany Department of Computer Engineering Sharif University of Technology Tehran Iran School of Computing Queen's University Kingston Canada Department of Computer Science Guru Nanak Dev University Amritsar India Karlsruhe Germany Brunel University London Uxbridge United Kingdom Institute of Computer Science University of Goettingen Germany University of Tehran Tehran Iran Ericsson Hungary Ltd. Budapest Hungary Simula Research Laboratory Fornebu Norway Technical University of Košice Košice Slovakia LUT University Finland National University of Defense Technology Changsha China University of British Columbia Kelowna Canada Østfold University College Halden Norway Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Canada IBM Boulder United States University of Missouri-Kansas City Kansas City United States Università della Svizzera italiana Lugano Switzerland Trent University Peterborough Canada University of Maryland Baltimore County United States Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University Saudi Arabia The Hebrew University Acumen Jerusalem Israel University of Oulu Oulu Finland Monash University Melbourne Australia University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany Technische Universität Darmstadt Darmstadt Germany University of Tennessee Knoxville United States University of Macedonia Thessaloniki Greece Department of Computer Engineering Bilkent University Ankara Turkey University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia Independent Researcher Tehran Iran University of Trento Trento Italy University of Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany Purdue University West LafayetteIN United States Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven Netherlands Softtech Inc. Research and Development Center Istanbul34947 Turkey Radboud Universi

Context: Tangled commits are changes to software that address multiple concerns at once. For researchers interested in bugs, tangled commits mean that they actually study not only bugs, but also other concerns irrelevant for the study of bugs. Objective: We want to improve our understanding of the prevalence of tangling and the types of changes that are tangled within bug fixing commits. Methods: We use a crowd sourcing approach for manual labeling to validate which changes contribute to bug fixes for each line in bug fixing commits. Each line is labeled by four participants. If at least three participants agree on the same label, we have consensus. Results: We estimate that between 17% and 32% of all changes in bug fixing commits modify the source code to fix the underlying problem. However, when we only consider changes to the production code files this ratio increases to 66% to 87%. We find that about 11% of lines are hard to label leading to active disagreements between participants. Due to confirmed tangling and the uncertainty in our data, we estimate that 3% to 47% of data is noisy without manual untangling, depending on the use case. Conclusion: Tangled commits have a high prevalence in bug fixes and can lead to a large amount of noise in the data. Prior research indicates that this noise may alter results. As researchers, we should be skeptics and assume that unvalidated data is likely very noisy, until proven otherwise. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Uncertainty analysis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section in proton-proton collisions at s = 5.02 TeV

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2025年第1期2025卷 1-49页

作者： Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J.W. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Escalante Del Valle, A. Hussain, P.S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Lechner, L. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Templ, S. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Darwish, M.R. Janssen, T. Kello, T. Van Mechelen, P. Bols, E.S. D’Hondt, J. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. El Faham, H. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Morton, A. Müller, D. Sahasransu, A.R. Tavernier, S. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Clerbaux, B. Dansana, S. De Lentdecker, G. Favart, L. Hohov, D. Jaramillo, J. Lee, K. Mahdavikhorrami, M. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Pétré, L. Postiau, N. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Mestdach, G. Rendón, C. Samalan, A. Skovpen, K. Tytgat, M. Van Den Bossche, N. Vermassen, B. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bruno, G. Bury, F. Caputo, C. Delaere, C. Donertas, I.S. Giammanco, A. Jaffel, K. Jain, Sa. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Mondal, K. Tran, T.T. Vischia, P. Wertz, S. Alves, G.A. Coelho, E. Hensel, C. Moraes, A. Rebello Teles, P. Aldá Júnior, W.L. Alves Gallo Pereira, M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E.M. Da Silveira, G.G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Dos Santos Sousa, V. Fonseca De Souza, S. Martins, J. Mora Herrera, C. Mota Amarilo, K. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Santoro, A. Silva Do Amaral, S.M. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Vilela Pereira, A. Bernardes, C.A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T.R. Gregores, E.M. Mercadante, P.G. Novaes, S.F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Ivanov, T. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Guo, Q. Javaid, T. Mittal, M. Yuan, L. Bauer, G. Hu, Z. Lezki, S. Yi, K. Chen, G.M. Chen, H.S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C.H. Kapoor, A. Liao, H. Liu, Z.-A. Monti, F. Sharma, R. Song, J.N. Tao, J. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Aga Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) — Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Zhejiang Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Venezuela Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU) Fayoum University El-Fayoum Egypt National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tallinn Estonia Department of Physics

The inclusive jet cross section is measured as a function of jet transverse momentum pT and rapidity y. The measurement is performed using proton-proton collision data at s = 5.02 TeV, recorded by the CMS experiment a... 详细信息

The inclusive jet cross section is measured as a function of jet transverse momentum p_T and rapidity y. The measurement is performed using proton-proton collision data at s = 5.02 TeV, recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 27.4 pb⁻¹. The jets are reconstructed with the anti-k_T algorithm using a distance parameter of R = 0.4, within the rapidity interval |y| < 2, and across the kinematic range 0.06 < p_T< 1 TeV. The jet cross section is unfolded from detector to particle level using the determined jet response and resolution. The results are compared to predictions of perturbative quantum chromodynamics, calculated at both next-to-leading order and next-to-next-to-leading order. The predictions are corrected for nonperturbative effects, and presented for a variety of parton distribution functions and choices of the renormalization/factorization scales and the strong coupling α_S. © The Author(s) 2025.

关键词： Hadron-Hadron Scattering Jet Physics QCD

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Measurement and interpretation of same-sign W boson pair production in association with two jets in pp collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV with the ATLAS detector

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2024年第4期2024卷 26页

作者： Aad, G. Abbott, B. Abeling, K. Abicht, N.J. Abidi, S.H. Aboulhorma, A. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, H. Abulaiti, Y. Abusleme Hoffman, A.C. Acharya, B.S. Adam Bourdarios, C. Adamczyk, L. Adamek, L. Addepalli, S.V. Addison, M.J. Adelman, J. Adiguzel, A. Adye, T. Affolder, A.A. Afik, Y. Agaras, M.N. Agarwala, J. Aggarwal, A. Agheorghiesei, C. Ahmad, A. Ahmadov, F. Ahmed, W.S. Ahuja, S. Ai, X. Aielli, G. Aikot, A. Ait Tamlihat, M. Aitbenchikh, B. Aizenberg, I. Akbiyik, M. Åkesson, T.P.A. Akimov, A.V. Akiyama, D. Akolkar, N.N. Al Khoury, K. Alberghi, G.L. Albert, J. Albicocco, P. Albouy, G.L. Alderweireldt, S. Aleksa, M. Aleksandrov, I.N. Alexa, C. Alexopoulos, T. Alfonsi, F. Algren, M. Alhroob, M. Ali, B. Ali, H.M.J. Ali, S. Alibocus, S.W. Aliev, M. Alimonti, G. Alkakhi, W. Allaire, C. Allbrooke, B.M.M. Allen, J.F. Allendes Flores, C.A. Allport, P.P. Aloisio, A. Alonso, F. Alpigiani, C. Alvarez Estevez, M. Alvarez Fernandez, A. Alves Cardoso, M. Alviggi, M.G. Aly, M. Amaral Coutinho, Y. Ambler, A. Amelung, C. Amerl, M. Ames, C.G. Amidei, D. Amor Dos Santos, S.P. Amos, K.R. Ananiev, V. Anastopoulos, C. Andeen, T. Anders, J.K. Andrean, S.Y. Andreazza, A. Angelidakis, S. Angerami, A. Anisenkov, A.V. Annovi, A. Antel, C. Anthony, M.T. Antipov, E. Antonelli, M. Anulli, F. Aoki, M. Aoki, T. Aparisi Pozo, J.A. Aparo, M.A. Aperio Bella, L. Appelt, C. Apyan, A. Aranzabal, N. Arcangeletti, C. Arce, A.T.H. Arena, E. Arguin, J.-F. Argyropoulos, S. Arling, J.-H. Arnaez, O. Arnold, H. Artoni, G. Asada, H. Asai, K. Asai, S. Asbah, N.A. Assamagan, K. Astalos, R. Atashi, S. Atkin, R.J. Atkinson, M. Atmani, H. Atmasiddha, P.A. Augsten, K. Auricchio, S. Auriol, A.D. Austrup, V.A. Avolio, G. Axiotis, K. Azuelos, G. Babal, D. Bachacou, H. Bachas, K. Bachiu, A. Backman, F. Badea, A. Bagnaia, P. Bahmani, M. Bailey, A.J. Bailey, V.R. Baines, J.T. Baines, L. Bakalis, C. Baker, O.K. Bakos, E. Bakshi Gupta, D. Balakrishnan, V. Balasubramanian, R. Baldin, E.M. Balek, P. Ballabene, E. Balli, F. Baltes, L.M. Balunas, W.K. Balz, J. Banas, E. Bandieramont Department of Physics University of Adelaide Department of Physics University of Alberta Department of Physics Ankara University Division of Physics TOBB University of Economics and Technology LAPP Université Savoie Mont Blanc CNRS/IN2P3 APC Université Paris Cité CNRS/IN2P3 High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory Department of Physics University of Arizona Department of Physics University of Texas at Arlington Physics Department National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Physics Department National Technical University of Athens Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin Institute of Physics Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE) Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Physics Department Tsinghua University Department of Physics Nanjing University School of Science Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University University of Chinese Academy of Science (UCAS) Institute of Physics University of Belgrade Department for Physics and Technology University of Bergen Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of California Institut für Physik Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics University of Bern School of Physics and Astronomy University of Birmingham Department of Physics Bogazici University Department of Physics Engineering Gaziantep University Department of Physics Istanbul University Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigaciónes Universidad Antonio Nariño Departamento de Física Universidad Nacional de Colombia Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia A. Righi Università di Bologna INFN Sezione di Bologna Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Department of Physics Boston University Department of Physics Brandeis University Transilvania University of Brasov Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Department of Physics Alexandru

This paper presents the measurement of fiducial and differential cross sections for both the inclusive and electroweak production of a same-sign W-boson pair in association with two jets (W^±W^±jj) using 139 fb⁻¹ of proton-proton collision data recorded at a centre-of-mass energy of s = 13 TeV by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The analysis is performed by selecting two same-charge leptons, electron or muon, and at least two jets with large invariant mass and a large rapidity difference. The measured fiducial cross sections for electroweak and inclusive W^±W^±jj production are 2.92 ± 0.22 (stat.) ± 0.19 (syst.) fb and 3.38 ± 0.22 (stat.) ± 0.19 (syst.) fb, respectively, in agreement with Standard Model predictions. The measurements are used to constrain anomalous quartic gauge couplings by extracting 95% confidence level intervals on dimension-8 operators. A search for doubly charged Higgs bosons H^±± that are produced in vector-boson fusion processes and decay into a same-sign W boson pair is performed. The largest deviation from the Standard Model occurs for an H^±± mass near 450 GeV, with a global significance of 2.5 standard deviations. © The Author(s) 2024.

关键词： Hadron-Hadron Scattering Vector Boson Production

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A Power and Area Optimization Approach of Mixed Polarity Reed-Muller Expression for Incompletely Specified Boolean Functions

引用

Journal of computer Science & technology 2017年第2期32卷 297-311页

作者： Zhen-Xue He Li-Min Xiao Li Ruan Fei Gu Zhi-Sheng Huo Guang-Jun Qin Ming-Fa Zhu F Long-Bing Zhang Rui Liu Xiang Wang State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment Beihang University Beijing 100191 China School of Computer Science and Engineering Beihang University Beijing 100191 China School of Electronic and Information Engineering Beihang University Beijing 100191 China State Key Laboratory of Computer Architecture Institute of Computing Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 China National Engineering Research Center for Science and Technology Resources Sharing Service Beihang University Beijing 100191 China

The power and area optimization of Reed-Muller （RM） circuits has been widely concerned. However, almost none of the exiting power and area optimization approaches can obtain all the Pareto optimal solutions of the original problem and are efficient enough. Moreover, they have not considered the don＇t care terms, which makes the circuit performance unable to be further optimized. In this paper, we propose a power and area optimization approach of mixed polarity RM expression （MPRM） for incompletely specified Boolean functions based on Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II （NSGA-II）. Firstly, the incompletely specified Boolean function is transformed into zero polarity incompletely specified MPRM （ISMPRM） by using a novel ISMPRM acquisition algorithm. Secondly, the polarity and allocation of don＇t care terms of ISMPRM is encoded as chromosome. Lastly, the Pareto optimal solutions are obtained by using NSGA-II, in which MPRM corresponding to the given chromosome is obtained by using a chromosome conversion algorithm. The results on incompletely specified Boolean functions and MCNC benchmark circuits show that a significant power and area improvement can be made compared with the existing power and area optimization approaches of RM circuits.

关键词： power and area optimization Reed-Muller （RM） circuit Pareto optimal solution don＇t care term chromosomeconversion

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Higher-order moments of the elliptic flow distribution in PbPb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2024年第2期2024卷 1-45页

作者： Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J.W. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Escalante Del Valle, A. Hussain, P.S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Lechner, L. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Paulitsch, P. Pitters, F.M. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Templ, S. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Darwish, M.R. Janssen, T. Kello, T. Rejeb Sfar, H. Van Mechelen, P. Bols, E.S. D’Hondt, J. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. El Faham, H. Lowette, S. Moortgat, S. Morton, A. Müller, D. Sahasransu, A.R. Tavernier, S. Van Doninck, W. Vannerom, D. Clerbaux, B. De Lentdecker, G. Favart, L. Hohov, D. Jaramillo, J. Lee, K. Mahdavikhorrami, M. Makarenko, I. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Pétré, L. Postiau, N. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. Dobur, D. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Mestdach, G. Rendón, C. Samalan, A. Skovpen, K. Tytgat, M. Van Den Bossche, N. Vermassen, B. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bruno, G. Bury, F. Caputo, C. David, P. Delaere, C. Donertas, I.S. Giammanco, A. Jaffel, K. Jain, Sa. Lemaitre, V. Mondal, K. Taliercio, A. Tran, T.T. Vischia, P. Wertz, S. Alves, G.A. Coelho, E. Hensel, C. Moraes, A. Rebello Teles, P. Aldá Júnior, W.L. Alves Gallo Pereira, M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E.M. Da Silveira, G.G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Dos Santos Sousa, V. Fonseca De Souza, S. Martins, J. Mora Herrera, C. Mota Amarilo, K. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Santoro, A. Silva Do Amaral, S.M. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Vilela Pereira, A. Bernardes, C.A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T.R. Gregores, E.M. Mercadante, P.G. Novaes, S.F. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Rodozov, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Ivanov, T. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Javaid, T. Mittal, M. Yuan, L. Ahmad, M. Bauer, G. Hu, Z. Lezki, S. Yi, K. Chen, G.M. Chen, H.S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C.H. Kapoor, A. Liao, H. Liu, Z.-A. Milosevic, V. Monti, F. Sharma, R. Tao, J. Thomas-Wilsker Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) — Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Zhejiang Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU) Fayoum University El-Fayoum Egypt National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tallinn Estonia Department of Physics

The hydrodynamic flow-like behavior of charged hadrons in high-energy lead-lead collisions is studied through multiparticle correlations. The elliptic anisotropy values based on different orders of multiparticle cumulants, v₂{2k}, are measured up to the tenth order (k = 5) as functions of the collision centrality at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of s_NN = 5.02 TeV. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 0.607 nb⁻¹. A hierarchy is observed between the coefficients, with v₂{2} > v₂{4} ≳ v₂{6} ≳ v₂{8} ≳ v₂{10}. Based on these results, centrality-dependent moments for the fluctuation-driven event-by-event v₂ distribution are determined, including the skewness, kurtosis and, for the first time, superskewness. Assuming a hydrodynamic expansion of the produced medium, these moments directly probe the initial-state geometry in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions. © The Author(s) 2024.

关键词： Event-by-Event fluctuation Harmonic Flow Heavy Ion Experiments Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Measurement of the Higgs boson production via vector boson fusion and its decay into bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2024年第1期2024卷 173页

作者： Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J.W. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Escalante Del Valle, A. Hussain, P.S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Lechner, L. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Templ, S. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Darwish, M.R. Janssen, T. Kello, T. Van Mechelen, P. Bols, E.S. D’Hondt, J. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. El Faham, H. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Morton, A. Müller, D. Sahasransu, A.R. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Clerbaux, B. De Lentdecker, G. Favart, L. Hohov, D. Jaramillo, J. Khalilzadeh, A. Lee, K. Mahdavikhorrami, M. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Pétré, L. Postiau, N. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Mestdach, G. Rendón, C. Samalan, A. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. Vermassen, B. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bruno, G. Bury, F. Caputo, C. Delaere, C. Donertas, I.S. Giammanco, A. Jaffel, K. Jain, Sa. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Mondal, K. Tran, T.T. Wertz, S. Alves, G.A. Coelho, E. Hensel, C. Moraes, A. Rebello Teles, P. Aldá Júnior, W.L. Alves Gallo Pereira, M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E.M. Da Silveira, G.G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Martins, J. Mora Herrera, C. Mota Amarilo, K. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Santoro, A. Silva Do Amaral, S.M. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Vilela Pereira, A. Bernardes, C.A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T.R. Gregores, E.M. Mercadante, P.G. Novaes, S.F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Ivanov, T. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Guo, Q. Javaid, T. Mittal, M. Yuan, L. Bauer, G. Hu, Z. Yi, K. Chen, G.M. Chen, H.S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C.H. Kapoor, A. Liao, H. Liu, Z.-A. Monti, F. Sharma, R. Song, J.N. Tao, J. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Agapitos, A. Ban, Y. Levin, A. Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) — Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Zhejiang Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus Charles University Prague Czech Republic Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU) Fayoum University El-Fayoum Egypt National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tallinn Estonia Department of Physics

A measurement of the Higgs boson (H) production via vector boson fusion (VBF) and its decay into a bottom quark-antiquark pair (bb¯) is presented using proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment at s = 13 TeV and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 90.8 fb⁻¹. Treating the gluon-gluon fusion process as a background and constraining its rate to the value expected in the standard model (SM) within uncertainties, the signal strength of the VBF process, defined as the ratio of the observed signal rate to that predicted by the SM, is measured to be μ_Hbb¯^qqh=1.01_−0.46^+0.55. The VBF signal is observed with a significance of 2.4 standard deviations relative to the background prediction, while the expected significance is 2.7 standard deviations. Considering inclusive Higgs boson production and decay into bottom quarks, the signal strength is measured to be μ_Hbb¯^incl.=0.99_−0.41^+0.48, corresponding to an observed (expected) significance of 2.6 (2.9) standard deviations. © The Author(s) 2024.

关键词： B Physics Hadron-Hadron Scattering Higgs Physics

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

European Aerosol Phenomenology - 8: Harmonised Source Apportionment of Organic Aerosol using 22 Year-long ACSM/AMS Datasets

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Chen, Gang Canonaco, Francesco Tobler, Anna Aas, Wenche Alastuey, Andres Allan, James Atabakhsh, Samira Aurela, Minna Baltensperger, Urs Bougiatioti, Aikaterini De Brito, Joel F. Ceburnis, Darius Chazeau, Benjamin Chebaicheb, Hasna Daellenbach, Kaspar R. Ehn, Mikael Haddad, Imad El Eleftheriadis, Konstantinos Favez, Olivier Flentje, Harald Font, Anna Fossum, Kirsten Freney, Evelyn Gini, Maria Green, David C. Heikkinen, Liine Herrmann, Hartmut Kalogridis, Athina-Cerise Keernik, Hannes Lhotka, Radek Lin, Chunshui Lunder, Chris Maasikmets, Marek Manousakas, Manousos I. Marchand, Nicolas Marin, Cristina Marmureanu, Luminita Mihalopoulos, Nikolaos Močnik, Griša Nęcki, Jaroslaw O'Dowd, Colin Ovadnevaite, Jurgita Peter, Thomas Petit, Jean-Eudes Pikridas, Michael Platt, Stephen Matthew Pokorná, Petra Poulain, Laurent Priestman, Max Riffault, Véronique Rinaldi, Matteo Różański, Kazimierz Schwarz, Jaroslav Sciare, Jean Simon, Leïla Skiba, Alicja Slowik, Jay G. Sosedova, Yulia Stavroulas, Iasonas Styszko, Katarzyna Teinemaa, Erik Timonen, Hilkka Tremper, Anja Vasilescu, Jeni Via, Marta Vodička, Petr Wiedensohler, Alfred Zografou, Olga Minguillón, María Cruz Prévôt, André S.H. Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry Paul Scherrer Institute Villigen5232 Switzerland Datalystica Ltd. Park innovAARE Villigen5234 Switzerland NILU - Norwegian Institute for Air Research Kjeller2007 Norway Barcelona08034 Spain Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom National Centre for Atmospheric Science University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom Department of Chemistry The Atmosphere Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research Permoser Straße 15 Leipzig04318 Germany Atmospheric Composition Research Finnish Meteorological Institute P.O. Box 503 Helsinki00101 Finland Institute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development National Observatory of Athens Palaia Penteli Athens15236 Greece IMT Nord Europe Institut Mines-Télécom Univ. Lille Centre for Energy and Environment Lille59000 France School of Physics Ryan Institute's Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies National University of Ireland Galway University Road GalwayH91 CF50 Ireland Aix Marseille Univ. CNRS LCE Marseille France AtmoSud Regional Network for Air Quality Monitoring of Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur Marseille France Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques Parc Technologique ALATA Verneuil en Halatte 60550 France /Physics University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Institute of Nuclear & Radiological Sciences & Technology Energy & Safety N.C.S.R. "Demokritos" Athens15310 Greece Deutscher Wetterdienst Meteorologisches Observatorium Hohenpeißenberg Hohenpeißenberg 82383 Germany MRC Centre for Environment and Health Environmental Research Group Imperial College London 86 Wood Lane LondonW12 0BZ United Kingdom HPRU in Environmental Exposures and Health Imperial College London United Kingdom Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique UMR6016 Université Clermont Auvergne-CNRS Aubière France TallinnMarja 4D Estonia Department of Software Scienc

Organic aerosol (OA) is a key component to total submicron particulate matter (PM1), and comprehensive knowledge of OA sources across Europe is crucial to mitigate PM1 levels. Europe has a well-established air quality research infrastructure from which yearlong datasets using 21 aerosol chemical speciation monitors (ACSMs) and 1 aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) were gathered during 2013-2019. It includes 9 non-urban and 13 urban sites. This study developed a state-of-the-art source apportionment protocol to analyse long-term OA mass spectrum data by applying the most advanced source apportionment strategies (i.e., rolling PMF, ME-2, and bootstrap). This harmonised protocol was followed strictly for all 22 datasets, making the source apportionment results more comparable. In addition, it enables the quantifications of the most common OA components such as hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA), biomass burning OA (BBOA), cooking-like OA (COA), more oxidised-oxygenated OA (MO-OOA), and less oxidised-oxygenated OA (LO-OOA). Other components such as coal combustion OA (CCOA), solid fuel OA (SFOA: mainly mixture of coal and peat combustion), cigarette smoke OA (CSOA), sea salt (mostly inorganic but part of the OA mass spectrum), coffee OA, and ship industry OA could also be separated at a few specific sites. Oxygenated OA (OOA) components make up most of the submicron OA mass (average = 71.1%, range from 43.7 to 100%). Solid fuel combustion-related OA components (i.e., BBOA, CCOA, and SFOA) are still considerable with in total 16.0% yearly contribution to the OA, yet mainly during winter months (21.4%). Overall, this comprehensive protocol works effectively across all sites governed by different sources and generates robust and consistent source apportionment results. Our work presents a comprehensive overview of OA sources in Europe with a unique combination of high time resolution (30-240 minutes) and long-term data coverage (9-36 months), providing essential information to improve/

关键词： Aerosols

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Fatigue strength assessment on a floating process and supply basement based on equivalent design waves 27

Fatigue strength assessment on a floating process and supply...

引用

27th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE 2017

作者： Yue, Jingxia Guo, Yulong Peng, Lihua Dong, Wei He, Zheng Zhu, Zhentao School of Transportation Wuhan University of Technology China China Ship Development and Design Center Wuhan China Computer School Wuhan University China Shanghai Bestway Marine Engineering Research and Design Company Wuhan China

ISBN: (纸本)9781880653975

Fatigue strength assessment on marine structures is usually implemented through simplified approach or spectral analysis, both of which are soundly guided by classification societies. However, the former method tends to overestimate the fatigue damage due to the assumed severer environment loadings;and the latter method involves complex hydrodynamic simulations due to its inherent uncertainties. In this paper, fatigue strength assessment was carried out for a Floating Process and Supply Basement (FPSB) served in the South China Sea by using an improved simplified method. Unlike the ships' various navigation area, FPSB's working area is relatively fixed and its environment condition can be described with less uncertainty parameters. Therefore, an equivalent design wave (EDW) was deduced based on the same wave scatter diagram used in spectral analysis. Under the loading of EDW, the ship hull strength was estimated by the global Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and fatigue damages at the typical structural details in the mid-ship section were evaluated by the hotspot stress approach. The sensitive analysis of two wave loading parameters, wave frequency and wave direction, on fatigue damage were carried out by using the Sobol's model. The fatigue damages of the FPSB's two structural details can be well estimated by the proposed simplified method based on EDW. The wave frequency is a more influential parameter than the wave direction as for the accumulated fatigue damage. Copyright © 2017 by the International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE).

关键词： Sensitivity analysis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：