检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Conference on computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Lekadir, Karim Feragen, Aasa Fofanah, Abdul Joseph Frangi, Alejandro F. Buyx, Alena Emelie, Anais Lara, Andrea Porras, Antonio R. Chan, An-Wen Navarro, Arcadi Glocker, Ben Botwe, Benard O. Khanal, Bishesh Beger, Brigit Wu, Carol C. Cintas, Celia Langlotz, Curtis P. Rueckert, Daniel Mzurikwao, Deogratias Fotiadis, Dimitrios I. Zhussupov, Doszhan Ferrante, Enzo Meijering, Erik Weicken, Eva González, Fabio A. Asselbergs, Folkert W. Prior, Fred Krestin, Gabriel P. Collins, Gary S. Tegenaw, Geletaw S. Kaissis, Georgios Misuraca, Gianluca Tsakou, Gianna Dwivedi, Girish Kondylakis, Haridimos Jayakody, Harsha Woodruf, Henry C. Mayer, Horst Joachim Aerts, Hugo JWL Walsh, Ian Chouvarda, Ioanna Buvat, Irène Tributsch, Isabell Rekik, Islem Duncan, James Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Zahir, Jihad Park, Jinah Mongan, John Gichoya, Judy W. Schnabel, Julia A. Kushibar, Kaisar Riklund, Katrine Mori, Kensaku Marias, Kostas Amugongo, Lameck M. Fromont, Lauren A. Maier-Hein, Lena Alberich, Leonor Cerdá Rittner, Leticia Phiri, Lighton Marrakchi-Kacem, Linda Donoso-Bach, Lluís Martí-Bonmatí, Luis Cardoso, M. Jorge Bobowicz, Maciej Shabani, Mahsa Tsiknakis, Manolis Zuluaga, Maria A. Bielikova, Maria Fritzsche, Marie-Christine Camacho, Marina Linguraru, Marius George Wenzel, Markus De Bruijne, Marleen Tolsgaard, Martin G. Ghassemi, Marzyeh Ashrafuzzaman, Md Goisauf, Melanie Yaqub, Mohammad Abadía, Mónica Cano Mahmoud, Mukhtar M.E. Elattar, Mustafa Rieke, Nicola Papanikolaou, Nikolaos Lazrak, Noussair Díaz, Oliver Salvado, Olivier Pujol, Oriol Sall, Ousmane Guevara, Pamela Gordebeke, Peter Lambin, Philippe Brown, Pieta Abolmaesumi, Purang Dou, Qi Lu, Qinghua Osuala, Richard Nakasi, Rose Zhou, S. Kevin Napel, Sandy Colantonio, Sara Albarqouni, Shadi Joshi, Smriti Carter, Stacy Klein, Stefan Petersen, Steffen E. Aussó, Susanna Awate, Suyash Raviv, Tammy Riklin Cook, Tessa Mutsvangwa, Tinashe E.M. Rogers, Wendy A. Niessen, Wiro J. Puig-Bosch, Xènia Zeng, Yi Mohammed, Yunusa G. Aquino, Yves Saint James Salahuddin, Zohaib Starmans, Martijn P.A. Department de Matemàtiques i Informàtica Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain Barcelona Spain DTU Compute Technical University of Denmark Kgs Lyngby Denmark Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Faculty of Science and Technology Milton Margai Technical University Freetown Sierra Leone Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine Schools of Computing and Medicine University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom Cardiovascular Science and Electronic Engineering Departments KU Leuven Leuven Belgium Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Faculty of Engineering of Systems Informatics and Sciences of Computing Galileo University Guatemala City Guatemala Department of Biostatistics and Informatics Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus AuroraCO United States Department of Medicine Women’s College Research Institute University of Toronto Toronto Canada Universitat Pompeu Fabra BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center Barcelona Spain Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom School of Biomedical & Allied Health Sciences University of Ghana Accra Ghana Department of Midwifery & Radiography School of Health & Psychological Sciences City University of London United Kingdom Kathmandu Nepal European Heart Network Brussels Belgium Department of Thoracic Imaging University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston United States IBM Research Africa Nairobi Kenya Departments of Radiology Medicine and Biomedical Data Science Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford United States Institute for AI and Informatics in Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University Munich Munich Germany Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Dar es Salaam Tanzania United Republic of Ioannina Greece Almaty AI Lab Almaty Kazakhstan

Background: Despite major advances in artificial intelligence (AI) research for healthcare, the deployment and adoption of AI technologies remain limited in clinical practice. In recent years, concerns have been raised about the clinical, technical, ethical and legal risks associated with healthcare AI. To increase adoption in the real world, it is essential that AI technologies are trusted and accepted by patients, clinicians, health organisations and authorities. This paper describes the FUTURE-AI framework as the first international consensus guideline for trustworthy AI in healthcare. Methods: The FUTURE-AI consortium was founded in 2021 and now comprises 117 interdisciplinary experts from 50 countries representing all continents, including AI scientists, clinical researchers, biomedical ethicists, and social scientists. Over a two-year period, the consortium established guiding principles and best practices for trustworthy and deployable AI through an iterative process comprising an in-depth literature review, a modified Delphi survey, and online consensus meetings. Findings: The FUTURE-AI framework was established based on six guiding principles for trustworthy AI in healthcare, i.e. Fairness, Universality, Traceability, Usability, Robustness and Explainability. Through consensus, a set of 30 best practices were defined, addressing technical, clinical, socio-ethical and legal dimensions of trustworthy AI. The recommendations cover the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, from design, development and validation to regulation, deployment, and monitoring. Interpretation: FUTURE-AI is a structured, risk-informed framework which provides guidance for constructing healthcare AI tools that will be trusted, deployed and adopted in real-world clinical practice. researchers are encouraged to take the recommendations into account in proof-of-concept stages to facilitate future translation towards clinical practice of healthcare AI. Copyright © 2023, The Authors. All rights

关键词： Clinical research

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

26th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting (CNS*2017): Part 3 Antwerp, Belgium. 15-20 July 2017 Abstracts

引用

BMC NEUROSCIENCE 2017年第SUPPL 1期18卷 95-176页

作者： [Anonymous] Department of Neuroscience Yale University New Haven CT 06520 USA Department Physiology & Pharmacology SUNY Downstate Brooklyn NY 11203 USA NYU School of Engineering 6 MetroTech Center Brooklyn NY 11201 USA Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona 08028 Spain Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerrannée (INMED) INSERM UMR901 Aix-Marseille Univ Marseille France Center of Neural Science New York University New York NY USA Aix-Marseille Univ INSERM INS Inst Neurosci Syst Marseille France Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modélisation CNRS UMR 8089 Université de Cergy-Pontoise 95300 Cergy-Pontoise Cedex France Department of Mathematics and Computer Science ENSAT Abdelmalek Essaadi’s University Tangier Morocco Laboratory of Natural Computation Department of Information and Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics University of Salerno 84084 Fisciano SA Italy Department of Medicine University of Salerno 84083 Lancusi SA Italy Dipartimento di Fisica Università degli Studi Aldo Moro Bari and INFN Sezione Di Bari Italy Data Analysis Department Ghent University Ghent Belgium Coma Science Group University of Liège Liège Belgium Cruces Hospital and Ikerbasque Research Center Bilbao Spain BIOtech Department of Industrial Engineering University of Trento and IRCS-PAT FBK 38010 Trento Italy Department of Data Analysis Ghent University Ghent 9000 Belgium The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London London WC1N 3BG UK Department of Electronic Engineering NED University of Engineering and Technology Karachi Pakistan Blue Brain Project École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Departement of Mathematics Swansea University Swansea Wales UK Laboratory for Topology and Neuroscience at the Brain Mind Institute École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Institute of Mathematics University of Aberdeen Aberdeen Scotland UK Department of Integrativ

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Reward Processing in Novelty Seekers: A Transdiagnostic Psychiatric Imaging Biomarker

引用

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY 2021年第8期90卷 529-539页

作者： Qi, Shile Schumann, Gunter Bustillo, Juan Turner, Jessica A. Jiang, Rongtao Zhi, Dongmei Fu, Zening Mayer, Andrew R. Vergara, Victor M. Silva, Rogers F. Iraji, Armin Chen, Jiayu Damaraju, Eswar Ma, Xiaohong Yang, Xiao Stevens, Michael Mathalon, Daniel H. Ford, Judith M. Voyvodic, James Mueller, Bryon A. Belger, Aysenil Potkin, Steven G. Preda, Adrian Zhuo, Chuanjun Xu, Yong Chu, Congying Banaschewski, Tobias Barker, Gareth J. Bokde, Arun L. W. Quinlan, Erin Burke Desrivieres, Sylvane Flor, Herta Grigis, Antoine Garavan, Hugh Gowland, Penny Heinz, Andreas Martinot, Jean-Luc Martinot, Marie-Laure Paillere Artiges, Eric Nees, Frauke Orfanos, Dimitri Papadopoulos Paus, Tomas Poustka, Luise Hohmann, Sarah Frohner, Juliane H. Smolka, Michael N. Walter, Henrik Whelan, Robert Calhoun, Vince D. Sui, Jing [a]Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science Georgia State University Georgia Institute Technology and Emory University Atlanta Georgia [b]Department of Psychiatry University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico [c]Department of Psychology Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia [d]Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center Hartford Connecticut [e]Department of Psychiatry University of California San Francisco San Francisco California [f]Department of Radiology Duke University Durham North Carolina [g]Department of Psychiatry University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina [h]Department of Psychiatry University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota [i]Department of Psychiatry University of California Irvine Irvine California [j]Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology University of Vermont Burlington Vermont [k]Centre for Population Neuroscience and Stratified Medicine Institute for Science and Technology of Brain-Inspired Intelligence Fudan University Shanghai China [l]University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China [dd]Department of Computer Science and Engineering Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China [m]Brainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition Institute of Automation Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China [ee]State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning Beijing Normal University Beijing China [n]Psychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China [o]Department of Psychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics and Morbidity Laboratory Nankai University Affiliated Anding Hospital Tianjin China [p]Department of Humanities and Social Science Shanxi Medical University Taiyuan China [q]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Charité Mitte corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Univers

BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional reward processing is implicated in multiple mental disorders. Novelty seeking (NS) assesses preference for seeking novel experiences, which is linked to sensitivity to reward environmental cues. METHODS: A subset of 14-year-old adolescents (IMAGEN) with the top 20% ranked high-NS scores was used to identify high-NS-associated multimodal components by supervised fusion. These features were then used to longitudinally predict five different risk scales for the same and unseen subjects (an independent dataset of subjects at 19 years of age that was not used in predictive modeling training at 14 years of age) (within IMAGEN, n z 1100) and even for the corresponding symptom scores of five types of patient cohorts (non-IMAGEN), including drinking (n = 313), smoking (n = 104), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 320), major depressive disorder (n = 81), and schizophrenia (n = 147), as well as to classify different patient groups with diagnostic labels. RESULTS: Multimodal biomarkers, including the prefrontal cortex, striatum, amygdala, and hippocampus, associated with high NS in 14-year-old adolescents were identified. The prediction models built on these features are able to longitudinally predict five different risk scales, including alcohol drinking, smoking, hyperactivity, depression, and psychosis for the same and unseen 19-year-old adolescents and even predict the corresponding symptom scores of five types of patient cohorts. Furthermore, the identified reward-related multimodal features can classify among attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia with an accuracy of 87.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with higher NS scores can be used to reveal brain alterations in the reward-related system, implicating potential higher risk for subsequent development of multiple disorders. The identified high-NS- associated multimodal reward-related signatures may serve as a transdiagnostic neuroimaging bi

关键词： ADHD Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Major depressive disorders MDD Novelty seeking Reward processing Schizophrenia Substance use

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

ARCTIC TRAFFICABILITY PROGRAM - A REVIEW

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 169-175页

作者： VOELKER, R GLEN, IF SEIBOLD, F BAYLY, I Richard Voelker:is Vice President of ARCTEC Incorporated a firm specializing in cold regions technology. He has been responsible for the management of thePolarClass Traffic-ability Program since its inception and annually participates in the field data collection in the Arctic. His prior experience includes positions with the U.S. Coast Guard in the icebreaker design project the Military Sealift Command and at Newport News Shipbuilding. He is a graduate of N. Y.S. Maritime College and has a MS degree from the University of Michigan. I.F. Glen:received his professional degrees in naval architecture from the Royal Naval Engineering College Manadon Plymouth and RN College Greenwich London entering the Royal Corps of Naval Constructors in 1967. After serving as a Constructor Lieutenant in the Royal Navy's Far East Fleet for a short period he joined the Polaris submarine project team in Bath England in 1968. In 1971 he was seconded to the Canadian Department of National Defense in Ottawa as a Constructor Lieutenant Commander under NATO exchange arrangements where he had responsibilities initially for conventional submarines and latterly for computer aided conceptual design. He ventured to Bath England in 1974 and joined Forward Design Group. In 1975 he took a position as a civilian engineer in the Canadian Defense Department and was Head of Hull Systems Engineering from 1977 to 1979. He joined ARCTEC CANADA LIMITED in 1980 and in addition to managing ice model testing projects and full scale trials has specialized in structural response of ships to ice impact. He headed ARCTEC's Kanata Laboratory from 1981 to 1983 when he was promoted to president. Frederick Seibold:is a research program manager with the Maritime Administration's Office of Advanced Ship Development and Technology. He is responsible for the marine science program which includes research in the areas of ship powering structures and propeller performance and Arctic technology. Mr. Seibold has been employed by Mar Ad since 1961 having hel

This paper describes a multiyear program to make an operational assessment on the feasibility of a year-round Arctic marine transportation system to serve Alaska. Specifically, the three objectives were to: collect meteorological and ice data along potential marine routes; instrument the hull and propulsion machinery to improve design critera for ice-worthy ships; and demonstrate that ships can operate in midwinter Alaskan Arctic ice conditions. The U.S. Coast Guard's Polar class icebreakers were used to make the operational assessment by annually extending the route northward and by operating throughout the winter season. This paper reviews some of the operational and technical achievements to date, as well as plans for future Arctic deployments.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Beyond Low Earth Orbit: Biological research, Artificial Intelligence, and Self-Driving Labs

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Sanders, Lauren M. Yang, Jason H. Scott, Ryan T. Qutub, Amina Ann Martin, Hector Garcia Berrios, Daniel C. Hastings, Jaden J.A. Rask, Jon Mackintosh, Graham Hoarfrost, Adrienne L. Chalk, Stuart Kalantari, John Khezeli, Kia Antonsen, Erik L. Babdor, Joel Barker, Richard Baranzini, Sergio E. Beheshti, Afshin Delgado-Aparicio, Guillermo M. Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Greene, Casey S. Haendel, Melissa Hamid, Arif A. Heller, Philip Jamieson, Daniel Jarvis, Katelyn J. Komarova, Svetlana V. Komorowski, Matthieu Kothiyal, Prachi Mahabal, Ashish Manor, Uri Mason, Christopher E. Matar, Mona Mias, George I. Miller, Jack Myers, Jerry G. Nelson, Charlotte Oribello, Jonathan Park, Seung-Min Parsons-Wingerter, Patricia Prabhu, R.K. Reynolds, Robert J. Saravia-Butler, Amanda Saria, Suchi Sawyer, Aenor Singh, Nitin Kumar Soboczenski, Frank Snyder, Michael Soman, Karthik Theriot, Corey A. van Valen, David Venkateswaran, Kasthuri Warren, Liz Worthey, Liz Zitnik, Marinka Costes, Sylvain V. Blue Marble Space Institute of Science Space Biosciences Division NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field CA94035 United States Center for Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens Department of Microbiology Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Rutgers New Jersey Medical School NewarkNJ07103 United States KBR Space Biosciences Division NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field CA94035 United States AI MATRIX Consortium Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Texas San Antonio and UT Health Sciences San AntonioTX78249 United States Biological Systems and Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. BerkeleyCA94608 United States DOE Agile BioFoundry EmeryvilleCA94608 United States Joint BioEnergy Institute EmeryvilleCA94608 United States Department of Physiology and Biophysics Weill Cornell Medicine New YorkNY10065 United States Office of the Center Director NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field CA94035 United States Bay Area Environmental Research Institute NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field CA94035 United States Space Biosciences Division NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field CA94035 United States Department of Chemistry University of North Florida JacksonvilleFL32224 United States Center for Individualized Medicine Department of Surgery Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Mayo Clinic RochesterMN55905 United States Department of Emergency Medicine Center for Space Medicine Baylor College of Medicine HoustonTX77030 United States Department of Microbiology and Immunology Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco San FranciscoCA94143 United States The Gilroy AstroBiology Research Group The University of Wisconsin - Madison MadisonWI53706 United States Weill Institute for Neurosciences Department of Neurology University of California San Francisco San FranciscoCA94158 United States Data Science Analytics Georgia Institute of Technology Lima15024

Space biology research aims to understand fundamental effects of spaceflight on organisms, develop foundational knowledge to support deep space exploration, and ultimately bioengineer spacecraft and habitats to stabilize the ecosystem of plants, crops, microbes, animals, and humans for sustained multi-planetary life. To advance these aims, the field leverages experiments, platforms, data, and model organisms from both spaceborne and ground-analog studies. As research is extended beyond low Earth orbit, experiments and platforms must be maximally autonomous, light, agile, and intelligent to expedite knowledge discovery. Here we present a summary of recommendations from a workshop organized by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration on artificial intelligence, machine learning, and modeling applications which offer key solutions toward these space biology challenges. In the next decade, the synthesis of artificial intelligence into the field of space biology will deepen the biological understanding of spaceflight effects, facilitate predictive modeling and analytics, support maximally autonomous and reproducible experiments, and efficiently manage spaceborne data and metadata, all with the goal to enable life to thrive in deep space. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Predictive analytics

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Beyond Low Earth Orbit: Biomonitoring, Artificial Intelligence, and Precision Space Health

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Scott, Ryan T. Antonsen, Erik L. Sanders, Lauren M. Hastings, Jaden J.A. Park, Seung-Min Mackintosh, Graham Reynolds, Robert J. Hoarfrost, Adrienne L. Sawyer, Aenor Greene, Casey S. Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Theriot, Corey A. Berrios, Daniel C. Miller, Jack Babdor, Joel Barker, Richard Baranzini, Sergio E. Beheshti, Afshin Chalk, Stuart Delgado-Aparicio, Guillermo M. Haendel, Melissa Hamid, Arif A. Heller, Philip Jamieson, Daniel Jarvis, Katelyn J. Kalantari, John Khezeli, Kia Komarova, Svetlana V. Komorowski, Matthieu Kothiyal, Prachi Mahabal, Ashish Manor, Uri Martin, Hector Garcia Mason, Christopher E. Matar, Mona Mias, George I. Myers, Jerry G. Nelson, Charlotte Oribello, Jonathan Parsons-Wingerter, Patricia Prabhu, R.K. Qutub, Amina Ann Rask, Jon Saravia-Butler, Amanda Saria, Suchi Singh, Nitin Kumar Soboczenski, Frank Snyder, Michael Soman, Karthik van Valen, David Venkateswaran, Kasthuri Warren, Liz Worthey, Liz Yang, Jason H. Zitnik, Marinka Costes, Sylvain V. KBR Space Biosciences Division NASA Ames Research Center Moffett FieldCA94035 United States Department of Emergency Medicine Center for Space Medicine Baylor College of Medicine HoustonTX77030 United States Blue Marble Space Institute of Science Space Biosciences Division NASA Ames Research Center Moffett FieldCA94035 United States Department of Physiology and Biophysics Weill Cornell Medicine New YorkNY10065 United States Department of Urology Department of Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine StanfordCA94305 United States Bay Area Environmental Research Institute NASA Ames Research Center Moffett FieldCA94035 United States Mortality Research & Consulting Inc. HoustonTX77058 United States Space Biosciences Division NASA Ames Research Center Moffett FieldCA94035 United States UC Space Health Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of California San Francisco San FranciscoCA94143 United States Center for Health AI Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus AuroraCO80045 United States Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health at Mount Sinai Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New YorkNY10065 United States Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health UTMB GalvestonTX77551 United States Human Health and Performance Directorate NASA Johnson Space Center HoustonTX77058 United States Department of Microbiology and Immunology Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco San FranciscoCA94143 United States The Gilroy AstroBiology Research Group The University of Wisconsin Madison MadisonWI53706 United States Weill Institute for Neurosciences Department of Neurology University of California San Francisco San FranciscoCA94158 United States Department of Chemistry University of North Florida JacksonvilleFL32224 United States Data Scienc

Human space exploration beyond low Earth orbit will involve missions of significant distance and duration. To effectively mitigate myriad space health hazards, paradigm shifts in data and space health systems are necessary to enable Earth-independence, rather than Earth-reliance. Promising developments in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning for biology and health can address these needs. We propose an appropriately autonomous and intelligent Precision Space Health system that will monitor, aggregate, and assess biomedical statuses;analyze and predict personalized adverse health outcomes;adapt and respond to newly accumulated data;and provide preventive, actionable, and timely insights to individual deep space crew members and iterative decision support to their crew medical officer. Here we present a summary of recommendations from a workshop organized by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on future applications of artificial intelligence in space biology and health. In the next decade, biomonitoring technology, biomarker science, spacecraft hardware, intelligent software, and streamlined data management must mature and be woven together into a Precision Space Health system to enable humanity to thrive in deep space. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Earth (planet)

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Automatic Intelligent System Using Medical of Things for Multiple Sclerosis Detection

引用

Computational intelligence and neuroscience 2023年第1期2023卷 4776770页

作者： Sujatha Krishnamoorthy Yaxi Zhang Seifedine Kadry Muhammad Attique Khan Majed Alhaisoni Nasser Mustafa Weifeng Yu Abdullah Alqahtani Zhejiang Bioinformatics International Science and Technology Cooperation Center Wenzhou-Kean University Wenzhou Zhejiang Province China. Wenzhou Municipal Key Lab of Applied Biomedical and Biopharmaceutical Informatics Wenzhou-Kean University Wenzhou Zhejiang Province China. Department of Neurology Wenzhou Central Hospital Medical Group Wenzhou 325000 China. Department of Applied Data Science Noroff University College Kristiansand Norway. Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC) Ajman University Ajman 346 UAE. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Lebanese American University Byblos Lebanon. Department of Computer Science HITEC University Taxila Pakistan. Computer Sciences Department College of Computer and Information Sciences Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University Riyadh 11671 Saudi Arabia. Wenzhou-Kean University School of Science and Technology Wenzhou Zhejiang Province China. College of Computer Engineering and Sciences Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Al-Kharj Saudi Arabia.

Malfunctions in the immune system cause multiple sclerosis (MS), which initiates mild to severe nerve damage. MS will disturb the signal communication between the brain and other body parts, and early diagnosis will help reduce the harshness of MS in humankind. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) supported MS detection is a standard clinical procedure in which the bio-image recorded with a chosen modality is considered to assess the severity of the disease. The proposed research aims to implement a convolutional neural network (CNN) supported scheme to detect MS lesions in the chosen brain MRI slices. The stages of this framework include (i) image collection and resizing, (ii) deep feature mining, (iii) hand-crafted feature mining, (iii) feature optimization with firefly algorithm, and (iv) serial feature integration and classification. In this work, five-fold cross-validation is executed, and the final result is considered for the assessment. The brain MRI slices with/without the skull section are examined separately, presenting the attained results. The experimental outcome of this study confirms that the VGG16 with random forest (RF) classifier offered a classification accuracy of >98% MRI with skull, and VGG16 with K-nearest neighbor (KNN) provided an accuracy of >98% without the skull.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2018年

作者： Bakas, Spyridon Reyes, Mauricio Jakab, Andras Bauer, Stefan Rempfler, Markus Crimi, Alessandro Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Berger, Christoph Ha, Sung Min Rozycki, Martin Prastawa, Marcel Alberts, Esther Lipkova, Jana Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Bilello, Michel Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Wiest, Roland Kirschke, Jan Wiestler, Benedikt Colen, Rivka Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Lamontagne, Pamela Marcus, Daniel Milchenko, Mikhail Nazeri, Arash Weber, Marc-Andr Mahajan, Abhishek Baid, Ujjwal Gerstner, Elizabeth Kwon, Dongjin Acharya, Gagan Agarwal, Manu Alam, Mahbubul Albiol, Alberto Albiol, Antonio Albiol, Francisco J. Alex, Varghese Allinson, Nigel Amorim, Pedro H.A. Amrutkar, Abhijit Anand, Ganesh Andermatt, Simon Arbel, Tal Arbelaez, Pablo Avery, Aaron Azmat, Muneeza Pranjal, B. Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Barth, Bill Batchelder, Thomas Batmanghelich, Kayhan Battistella, Enzo Beers, Andrew Belyaev, Mikhail Bendszus, Martin Benson, Eze Bernal, Jose Bharath, Halandur Nagaraja Biros, George Bisdas, Sotirios Brown, James Cabezas, Mariano Cao, Shilei Cardoso, Jorge M. Carver, Eric N. Casamitjana, Adri Castillo, Laura Silvana Cat, Marcel Cattin, Philippe Cérigues, Albert Chagas, Vinicius S. Chandra, Siddhartha Chang, Yi-Ju Chang, Shiyu Chang, Ken Chazalon, Joseph Chen, Shengcong Chen, Wei Chen, Jefferson W. Chen, Zhaolin Cheng, Kun Choudhury, Ahana Roy Chylla, Roger Clrigues, Albert Colleman, Steven Colmeiro, Ramiro German Rodriguez Combalia, Marc Costa, Anthony Cui, Xiaomeng Dai, Zhenzhen Dai, Lutao Daza, Laura Alexandra Deutsch, Eric Ding, Changxing Dong, Chao Dong, Shidu Dudzik, Wojciech Eaton-Rosen, Zach Egan, Gary Escudero, Guilherme Estienne, Tho Everson, Richard Fabrizio, Jonathan Fan, Yong Fang, Longwei Feng, Xue Ferrante, Enzo Fidon, Lucas Fischer, Martin French, Andrew P. Fridman, Naomi Fu, Huan Fuentes, David Gao, Yaozong Gates, Evan Gering, David Gholami, Amir Gierke, Willi Glocker, Ben Gong, Mingming Gonzlez-Vill, Sandra Grosges, T. Guan, Yuanfang Guo, Sheng Gupta, Sudeep Han, Woo-Sup Han, Il Song Harmuth, Ko Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics University of Bern Bern Switzerland Center for MR-Research University Children's Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland Support Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging Inselspital Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States Image-Based Biomedical Modeling Group Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai Health System New YorkNY United States Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research FrederickMD21701 United States Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health BethesdaMD20814 United States Department of Neurology University of Alabama at Birmingham BirminghamAL United States Department of Diagnostic Radiology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center HoustonTX United States Department of Psychology Washington University St. LouisMO United States Neuroimaging Informatics and Analysis Center Washington University St. LouisMO United States Department of Radiology Washington University St. LouisMO United States Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology University Medical Center Rostock Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6 Rostock18057 Germany Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai India Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Nanded India NVIDIA Santa Clara

Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross total resection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset. Copyright © 2018, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

HUMAN-FACTORS CONSIDERATIONS APPLIED TO OPERATIONS OF THE FFG-8 AND LAMPS MK III

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 191-199页

作者： BAITIS, AE APPLEBEE, TR MCNAMARA, TM A. Erich Baitis: a native of Germany came to the David W. Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center in 1957 as a cooperative student/trainee and received his B.S. degree in physics from Virginia Polytechnic Institute. As a 32-year-old naval architect in 1971 he received both the Vietnam Honor Service Medal and the Navy's Meritorious Civilian Service Award for his eight months as liaison with the Vietnamese Navy's ferro-cement program. As head of the Seakeeping and Stabilization Group of the Surface Ship Dynamics Branch his work has led to the development of a new standard Ship Motion Computer Program and the application of ship motions to ship habitability operability and survivability problems. A major area of this work has been the ship-aircraft interface which is particularly sensitive to ship motions wind and other environmental factors. He is a member of the American Society of Naval Engineers and was awarded the Solberg Award for 1982 “in recognition of significant engineering research and development contributions in the area of improved helicopter operations from a ship in a seaway.” Terrence A. Applebee:is currently a naval architect at the David W. Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center in the Surface Ship Dynamics Branch. he came to the Center after earning a B.S. degree in ocean engineering from Florida Institute of Technology in 1973. Since that time he has worked in the areas of seakeeping performance evaluation ship-helicopter interfacing and human factor considerations. He is a member of the American Society of Naval Engineers and the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. Thomas M. McNamara:is an employee of the John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in the ocean data acquisition program. From 1979 to 1983 he worked at David W. Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center in the Surface Ship Dynamics Branch. His expertise has focused on the development of computer models for human factor evaluations as well as motion stabilization systems. He has participated in the development of advanced stabilizat

The FFG 7/LAMPS MK III Operator Guidance Manual (OGM) was developed for all FFG-7 class frigates which are not fin stabilized or are operating with the fins off. The OGM was developed to assis the ship operators of the FFG-7 class in choosing ship speed and heading combinations which will minimize ship motion-related problems during various phases of the LAMPS deployment. Crew safety and performance were major concerns in the development of the OGM. This paper reviews the effect of human factors on ship operations during helicopter recovery, maintenance, and transit to and from the hangar.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：