检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2024年

作者： Wang, Meng Lin, Tian Lin, Aidi Yu, Kai Peng, Yuanyuan Wang, Lianyu Chen, Cheng Zou, Ke Liang, Huiyu Chen, Man Yao, Xue Zhang, Meiqin Huang, Binwei Zheng, Chaoxin Zhang, Peixin Chen, Wei Luo, Yilong Chen, Yifan Xia, Honghe Shi, Tingkun Zhang, Qi Guo, Jinming Chen, Xiaolin Wang, Jingcheng Chung Tham, Yih Liu, Dianbo Wong, Wendy Thakur, Sahil Fenner, Beau Fang, Danqi Liu, Siying Liu, Qingyun Huang, Yuqiang Zeng, Hongqiang Meng, Yanda Zhou, Yukun Jiang, Zehua Qiu, Minghui Zhang, Changqing Chen, Xinjian Wang, Sophia Y. Lee, Cecilia S. Sobrin, Lucia Cheung, Carol Y. Pang, Chi Pui Keane, Pearse A. Cheng, Ching-Yu Chen, Haoyu Fu, Huazhu Centre for Innovation & Precision Eye Health Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore117549 Singapore Department of Ophthalmology Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore117549 Singapore Joint Shantou International Eye Center Shantou University Chinese University of Hong Kong Guangdong Shantou515041 China Department of Radiology University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA19104 United States School of Biomedical Engineering Anhui Medical University Anhui Hefei230032 China College of Computer Science and Technology Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Jiangsu Nanjing211100 China Center of Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA02114 United States National Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science on Synthetic Vision College of Computer Science Sichuan University Sichuan Chengdu610065 China Big Vision Medical Technology Ltd. Suzhou China Singapore Eye Research Institute Singapore National Eye Centre Singapore Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences The Chinese University of Hong Kong 999077 Hong Kong Shenzhen Longgang E.N.T Hospital Guangdong Shenzhen518172 China Dongguan Songshan Lake Central Hospital Guangdong Dongguan523326 China Department of Computer Science University of Exeter ExeterEX4 4RN United Kingdom Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom Institute of Ophthalmology University College London London United Kingdom Tsinghua Medicine of Tsinghua University Beijing100084 China School of Clinical Medicine Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Beijing102218 China Foshan Aier Eye Hospital Guangdong Foshan528000 China College of Intelligence and Computing Tianjin University Tianjin300350 China School of Electr

Previous foundation models for retinal images were pre-trained with limited disease categories and knowledge base. Here we introduce RetiZero, a vision-language foundation model that leverages knowledge from over 400 fundus diseases. For RetiZero's pre-training, we compiled 341,896 fundus images paired with text descriptions, sourced from public datasets, ophthalmic literature, and online resources, encompassing a diverse range of diseases across multiple ethnicities and countries. RetiZero exhibits superior performance in several downstream tasks, including zero-shot disease recognition, image-to-image retrieval, and internal- and cross-domain disease identification. In zero-shot scenarios, RetiZero achieves Top5 accuracy scores of 0.8430 for 15 fundus diseases and 0.7561 for 52 fundus diseases. For image retrieval, it achieves Top5 scores of 0.9500 and 0.8860 for the same disease sets, respectively. Clinical evaluations show that RetiZero's Top3 zero-shot performance surpasses the average of 19 ophthalmologists from Singapore, China, and the United States. Furthermore, RetiZero significantly enhances clinicians' accuracy in diagnosing fundus disease. These findings underscore the value of integrating the RetiZero foundation model into clinical settings, where a variety of fundus diseases are encountered. © 2024, CC0.

关键词： Ophthalmology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The state-of-the-art in Cardiac MRI Reconstruction: Results of the CMRxRecon Challenge in MICCAI 2023

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Lyu, Jun Qin, Chen Wang, Shuo Wang, Fanwen Li, Yan Wang, Zi Guo, Kunyuan Ouyang, Cheng Tänzer, Michael Liu, Meng Sun, Longyu Sun, Mengting Li, Qin Shi, Zhang Hua, Sha Li, Hao Chen, Zhensen Zhang, Zhenlin Xin, Bingyu Metaxas, Dimitris N. Yiasemis, George Teuwen, Jonas Zhang, Liping Chen, Weitian Pang, Yanwei Liu, Xiaohan Razumov, Artem Dylov, Dmitry V. Dou, Quan Yan, Kang Xue, Yuyang Du, Yuning Dietlmeier, Julia Garcia-Cabrera, Carles Hemidi, Ziad Al-Haj Vogt, Nora Xu, Ziqiang Zhang, Yajing Chu, Ying-Hua Chen, Weibo Bai, Wenjia Zhuang, Xiahai Qin, Jing Wu, Lianmin Yang, Guang Qu, Xiaobo Wang, He Wang, Chengyan Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School 399 Revolution Drive BostonMA02215 United States Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering & I-X Imperial College London United Kingdom Digital Medical Research Center School of Basic Medical Sciences Fudan University Shanghai China Department of Bioengineering & I-X Imperial College London LondonW12 7SL United Kingdom Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit Royal Brompton Hospital Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust LondonSW3 6NP United Kingdom Department of Radiology Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China Department of Electronic Science Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine Institute of Artificial Intelligence Xiamen University Xiamen361102 China Department of Computing Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London LondonSW7 2AZ United Kingdom Human Phenome Institute Fudan University 825 Zhangheng Road Pudong New District Shanghai201203 China Department of Radiology Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Ruijin Hospital Lu Wan Branch Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence Fudan University Shanghai200433 China Department of Computer Science Rutgers University PiscatawayNJ08854 United States AI for Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam1066 CX Netherlands Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong TJK-BIIT Lab School of Electrical and Information Engineering Tianjin University Tianjin300072 China Skolkovo Institute Of Science And Technology Center for Artificial Intelligence Technology 30/1 Bolshoy blvd. Moscow121205 Russia Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Virginia

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides detailed and quantitative evaluation of the heart’s structure, function, and tissue characteristics with high-resolution spatial-temporal imaging. However, its slow imaging speed and motion artifacts are notable limitations. Undersampling reconstruction, especially data-driven algorithms, has emerged as a promising solution to accelerate scans and enhance imaging performance using highly under-sampled data. Nevertheless, the scarcity of publicly available cardiac k-space datasets and evaluation platform hinder the development of data-driven reconstruction algorithms. To address this issue, we organized the Cardiac MRI Reconstruction Challenge (CMRxRecon) in 2023, in collaboration with the 26th International Conference on Medical Image computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). CMRxRecon presented an extensive k-space dataset comprising cine and mapping raw data, accompanied by detailed annotations of cardiac anatomical structures. With overwhelming participation, the challenge attracted more than 285 teams and over 600 participants. Among them, 22 teams successfully submitted Docker containers for the testing phase, with 7 teams submitted for both cine and mapping tasks. All teams use deep learning based approaches, indicating that deep learning has predominately become a promising solution for the problem. The first-place winner of both tasks utilizes the E2E-VarNet architecture as backbones. In contrast, U-Net is still the most popular backbone for both multi-coil and single-coil reconstructions. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the challenge design, presents a summary of the submitted results, reviews the employed methods, and offers an in-depth discussion that aims to inspire future advancements in cardiac MRI reconstruction models. The summary emphasizes the effective strategies observed in Cardiac MRI reconstruction, including backbone architecture, loss function, pre-processing techn

关键词： Mapping

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: Sub-femtonewton force sensing in solution by super-resolved photonic force microscopy

引用

Nature Photonics 2024年 998页

作者： Xuchen Shan Dajing Wang Jinlong Shi Hongyan Zhu Xiaolan Zhong Baolei Liu Weichang Hao Fan Wang Lei Ding Qian Peter Su Shihui Wen Dayong Jin Lei Jiang Chaohao Chen Yang Wang Zhaocun Huang Lingqian Chang Shen S. J. Wang Peter John Reece Wei Ren Xunyu Lu Jie Lu Lingdong Sun School of Physics Beihang University Beijing People’s Republic of China Science and Technology Center for Quantum Biology National Institute of Extremely-Weak Magnetic Field Infrastructure Hangzhou People’s Republic of China School of Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology University of Technology Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia Centre for Atomaterials and Nanomanufacturing School of Science RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia Institute for Biomedical Materials and Devices (IBMD) School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences Faculty of Science University of Technology Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia Eastern Institute for Advanced Study Eastern Institute of Technology Ningbo People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Bio-Inspired Materials and Interfaces Sciences Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing People’s Republic of China Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Transformative Meta-Optical Systems Department of Electronic Materials Engineering Research School of Physics The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia Key Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (Ministry of Education) Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering Beihang University Beijing People’s Republic of China Computing and Information Systems Department Melbourne School of Engineering University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia School of Physics The University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering Shaanxi Normal University Xi’an People’s Republic of China Particles and Catalysis Research Laboratory School of Chemical Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute Faculty of Engineering and IT University of Technology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The medical segmentation decathlon

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Antonelli, Michela Reinke, Annika Bakas, Spyridon Farahani, keyvan Kopp-Schneider, Annette Landman, Bennett A. Litjens, Geert Menze, Bjoern Ronneberger, Olaf Summers, Ronald M. van Ginneken, Bram Bilello, Michel Bilic, Patrick Christ, Patrick F. Do, Richard K.G. Gollub, Marc J. Heckers, Stephan H. Huisman, Henkjan Jarnagin, William R. McHugo, Maureen K. Napel, Sandy Golia Pernicka, Jennifer S. Rhode, Kawal Tobon-Gomez, Catalina Vorontsov, Eugene Hulsmon, Hankan Meakin, James A. Ourselin, Sebastien Wiesenfarth, Manuel Arbeláez, Pablo Bae, Byeonguk Chen, Sihong Daza, Laura Feng, Jianjiang He, Baochun Isensee, Fabian Ji, Yuanfeng Jia, Fucang Kim, Namkug Kim, Ildoo Merhof, Dorit Pai, Akshay Park, Beomhee Perslev, Mathias Rezaiifar, Ramin Rippel, Oliver Sarasua, Ignacio Shen, Wei Son, Jaemin Wachinger, Christian Wang, Liansheng Wang, Yan Xia, Yingda Xu, Daguang Xu, Zhanwei Zheng, Yefeng Simpson, Amber L. Maier-Hein, Lena Cardoso, M. Jorge School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United Kingdom Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States BethesdaMD United States Heidelberg Germany Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Radboud University Medical Center Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Nijmegen Netherlands Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland DeepMind London United Kingdom School of Computing Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences Queen’s University KingstonON Canada Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New YorkNY United States BethesdaMD United States Department of Informatics Technische Universität München Germany Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New YorkNY United States Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTN United States Department of Radiology Stanford University StanfordCA United States Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering École Polytechnique de Montréal Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Medical Faculty University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany VUNO Inc. Seoul Korea Republic of Universidad de los Andes Colombia Department of Automation Tsinghua University Beijing China Heidelberg Germany Department of Computer Science Xiamen University Xiamen361005 China Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen China Kakao Brain Korea Republic of Institute of Imaging & Computer Vision RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany Cere

International challenges have become the de facto standard for comparative assessment of image analysis algorithms given a specific task. Segmentation is so far the most widely investigated medical image processing task, but the various segmentation challenges have typically been organized in isolation, such that algorithm development was driven by the need to tackle a single specific clinical problem. We hypothesized that a method capable of performing well on multiple tasks will generalize well to a previously unseen task and potentially outperform a custom-designed solution. To investigate the hypothesis, we organized the Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD)—a biomedical image analysis challenge, in which algorithms compete in a multitude of both tasks and modalities. The underlying data set was designed to explore the axis of difficulties typically encountered when dealing with medical images, such as small data sets, unbalanced labels, multi-site data and small objects. The MSD challenge confirmed that algorithms with a consistent good performance on a set of tasks preserved their good average performance on a different set of previously unseen tasks. Moreover, by monitoring the MSD winner for two years, we found that this algorithm continued generalizing well to a wide range of other clinical problems, further confirming our hypothesis. Three main conclusions can be drawn from this study: (1) state-of-the-art image segmentation algorithms are mature, accurate, and generalize well when retrained on unseen tasks;(2) consistent algorithmic performance across multiple tasks is a strong surrogate of algorithmic generalizability;(3) the training of accurate AI segmentation models is now commoditized to non AI *** Codes 68T07. © 2021, CC BY-NC-SA.

关键词： Image segmentation

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets

引用

Nature methods 2023年第6期20卷 824-835页

作者： Linus Manubens-Gil Zhi Zhou Hanbo Chen Arvind Ramanathan Xiaoxiao Liu Yufeng Liu Alessandro Bria Todd Gillette Zongcai Ruan Jian Yang Miroslav Radojević Ting Zhao Li Cheng Lei Qu Siqi Liu Kristofer E Bouchard Lin Gu Weidong Cai Shuiwang Ji Badrinath Roysam Ching-Wei Wang Hongchuan Yu Amos Sironi Daniel Maxim Iascone Jie Zhou Erhan Bas Eduardo Conde-Sousa Paulo Aguiar Xiang Li Yujie Li Sumit Nanda Yuan Wang Leila Muresan Pascal Fua Bing Ye Hai-Yan He Jochen F Staiger Manuel Peter Daniel N Cox Michel Simonneau Marcel Oberlaender Gregory Jefferis Kei Ito Paloma Gonzalez-Bellido Jinhyun Kim Edwin Rubel Hollis T Cline Hongkui Zeng Aljoscha Nern Ann-Shyn Chiang Jianhua Yao Jane Roskams Rick Livesey Janine Stevens Tianming Liu Chinh Dang Yike Guo Ning Zhong Georgia Tourassi Sean Hill Michael Hawrylycz Christof Koch Erik Meijering Giorgio A Ascoli Hanchuan Peng Institute for Brain and Intelligence Southeast University Nanjing China. Microsoft Corporation Redmond WA USA. Tencent AI Lab Bellevue WA USA. Computing Environment and Life Sciences Directorate Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USA. Kaya Medical Seattle WA USA. University of Cassino and Southern Lazio Cassino Italy. Center for Neural Informatics Structures and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study George Mason University Fairfax VA USA. Faculty of Information Technology Beijing University of Technology Beijing China. Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services Beijing China. Nuctech Netherlands Rotterdam the Netherlands. Janelia Research Campus Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ashburn VA USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computation and Signal Processing Anhui University Hefei China. Paige AI New York NY USA. Scientific Data Division and Biological Systems and Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Berkeley CA USA. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience UC Berkeley Berkeley CA USA. RIKEN AIP Tokyo Japan. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST) The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan. School of Computer Science University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia. Texas A&M University College Station TX USA. Cullen College of Engineering University of Houston Houston TX USA. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Taipei Taiwan. National Centre for Computer Animation Bournemouth University Poole UK. PROPHESEE Paris France. Department of Neuroscience Columbia University New York NY USA. Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute Columbia University New York NY USA. Department of Computer Science Northern Illinois Universit

BigNeuron is an open community bench-testing platform with the goal of setting open standards for accurate and fast automatic neuron tracing. We gathered a diverse set of image volumes across several species that is representative of the data obtained in many neuroscience laboratories interested in neuron tracing. Here, we report generated gold standard manual annotations for a subset of the available imaging datasets and quantified tracing quality for 35 automatic tracing algorithms. The goal of generating such a hand-curated diverse dataset is to advance the development of tracing algorithms and enable generalizable benchmarking. Together with image quality features, we pooled the data in an interactive web application that enables users and developers to perform principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, correlation and clustering, visualization of imaging and tracing data, and benchmarking of automatic tracing algorithms in user-defined data subsets. The image quality metrics explain most of the variance in the data, followed by neuromorphological features related to neuron size. We observed that diverse algorithms can provide complementary information to obtain accurate results and developed a method to iteratively combine methods and generate consensus reconstructions. The consensus trees obtained provide estimates of the neuron structure ground truth that typically outperform single algorithms in noisy datasets. However, specific algorithms may outperform the consensus tree strategy in specific imaging conditions. Finally, to aid users in predicting the most accurate automatic tracing results without manual annotations for comparison, we used support vector machine regression to predict reconstruction quality given an image volume and a set of automatic tracings.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2018年

作者： Bakas, Spyridon Reyes, Mauricio Jakab, Andras Bauer, Stefan Rempfler, Markus Crimi, Alessandro Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Berger, Christoph Ha, Sung Min Rozycki, Martin Prastawa, Marcel Alberts, Esther Lipkova, Jana Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Bilello, Michel Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Wiest, Roland Kirschke, Jan Wiestler, Benedikt Colen, Rivka Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Lamontagne, Pamela Marcus, Daniel Milchenko, Mikhail Nazeri, Arash Weber, Marc-Andr Mahajan, Abhishek Baid, Ujjwal Gerstner, Elizabeth Kwon, Dongjin Acharya, Gagan Agarwal, Manu Alam, Mahbubul Albiol, Alberto Albiol, Antonio Albiol, Francisco J. Alex, Varghese Allinson, Nigel Amorim, Pedro H.A. Amrutkar, Abhijit Anand, Ganesh Andermatt, Simon Arbel, Tal Arbelaez, Pablo Avery, Aaron Azmat, Muneeza Pranjal, B. Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Barth, Bill Batchelder, Thomas Batmanghelich, Kayhan Battistella, Enzo Beers, Andrew Belyaev, Mikhail Bendszus, Martin Benson, Eze Bernal, Jose Bharath, Halandur Nagaraja Biros, George Bisdas, Sotirios Brown, James Cabezas, Mariano Cao, Shilei Cardoso, Jorge M. Carver, Eric N. Casamitjana, Adri Castillo, Laura Silvana Cat, Marcel Cattin, Philippe Cérigues, Albert Chagas, Vinicius S. Chandra, Siddhartha Chang, Yi-Ju Chang, Shiyu Chang, Ken Chazalon, Joseph Chen, Shengcong Chen, Wei Chen, Jefferson W. Chen, Zhaolin Cheng, Kun Choudhury, Ahana Roy Chylla, Roger Clrigues, Albert Colleman, Steven Colmeiro, Ramiro German Rodriguez Combalia, Marc Costa, Anthony Cui, Xiaomeng Dai, Zhenzhen Dai, Lutao Daza, Laura Alexandra Deutsch, Eric Ding, Changxing Dong, Chao Dong, Shidu Dudzik, Wojciech Eaton-Rosen, Zach Egan, Gary Escudero, Guilherme Estienne, Tho Everson, Richard Fabrizio, Jonathan Fan, Yong Fang, Longwei Feng, Xue Ferrante, Enzo Fidon, Lucas Fischer, Martin French, Andrew P. Fridman, Naomi Fu, Huan Fuentes, David Gao, Yaozong Gates, Evan Gering, David Gholami, Amir Gierke, Willi Glocker, Ben Gong, Mingming Gonzlez-Vill, Sandra Grosges, T. Guan, Yuanfang Guo, Sheng Gupta, Sudeep Han, Woo-Sup Han, Il Song Harmuth, Ko Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics University of Bern Bern Switzerland Center for MR-Research University Children's Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland Support Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging Inselspital Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States Image-Based Biomedical Modeling Group Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai Health System New YorkNY United States Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research FrederickMD21701 United States Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health BethesdaMD20814 United States Department of Neurology University of Alabama at Birmingham BirminghamAL United States Department of Diagnostic Radiology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center HoustonTX United States Department of Psychology Washington University St. LouisMO United States Neuroimaging Informatics and Analysis Center Washington University St. LouisMO United States Department of Radiology Washington University St. LouisMO United States Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology University Medical Center Rostock Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6 Rostock18057 Germany Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai India Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Nanded India NVIDIA Santa Clara

Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross total resection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset. Copyright © 2018, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Mehta, Raghav Filos, Angelos Baid, Ujjwal Sako, Chiharu McKinley, Richard Rebsamen, Michael Dätwyler, Katrin Meier, Raphael Radojewski, Piotr Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan Nalawade, Sahil Ganesh, Chandan Wagner, Ben Yu, Fang F. Fei, Baowei Madhuranthakam, Ananth J. Maldjian, Joseph A. Daza, Laura Gómez, Catalina Arbeláez, Pablo Dai, Chengliang Wang, Shuo Reynaud, Hadrien Mo, Yuanhan Angelini, Elsa Guo, Yike Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Pei, Linmin Murat, A.K. Rosas-González, Sarahi Zemmoura, Ilyess Tauber, Clovis Vu, Minh H. Nyholm, Tufve Löfstedt, Tommy Ballestar, Laura Mora Vilaplana, Veronica McHugh, Hugh Talou, Gonzalo Maso Wang, Alan Patel, Jay Chang, Ken Hoebel, Katharina Gidwani, Mishka Arun, Nishanth Gupta, Sharut Aggarwal, Mehak Singh, Praveer Gerstner, Elizabeth R. Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Boutry, Nicolas Huard, Alexis Vidyaratne, Lasitha Rahman, Md Monibor Iftekharuddin, Khan M. Chazalon, Joseph Puybareau, Elodie Tochon, Guillaume Ma, Jun Cabezas, Mariano Llado, Xavier Oliver, Arnau Valencia, Liliana Valverde, Sergi Amian, Mehdi Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza Myronenko, Andriy Hatamizadeh, Ali Feng, Xue Dou, Quan Tustison, Nicholas Meyer, Craig Shah, Nisarg A. Talbar, Sanjay Weber, Marc-André Mahajan, Abhishek Jakab, Andras Wiest, Roland Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Nazeri, Arash Milchenko, Mikhail Marcus, Daniel Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Colen, Rivka Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Davatzikos, Christos Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Gal, Yarin Arbel, Tal McGill University MontrealQC Canada Group University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine The University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University of Bern Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland Department of Radiology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Department of Bioengineering University of Texas DallasTX United States Advanced Imaging Research Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Colombia Data Science Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom NIHR Imperial BRC ITMAT Data Science Group Imperial College London London United Kingdom Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London United Kingdom Machine Intelligence Unit Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata India Department of CSE University of Calcutta Kolkata India Department of Information Technology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Department of Diagnostic Radiology The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PittsburghPA United States UMR U1253 iBrain Université de Tours Inserm Tours France Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden Department of Computing Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand Radiology Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland New Zealand Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://***/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

26th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting (CNS*2017) of the Organization for Computational Neuroscience Antwerp, Belgium, July 15-20, 2017

引用

BMC NEUROSCIENCE 2017年第SUPPL 1期18卷 59-59页

作者： [Anonymous] Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Indianapolis IN 46032 USA Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN 46032 USA Department of Mathematics East Carolina University Greenville NC 27858 USA Jülich Supercomputing Centre Forschungszentrum Jülich 52425 Jülich Germany Future Systems Swiss National Supercomputing Centre 8092 Zurich Switzerland User Engagement and Support Swiss National Supercomputing Centre 6900 Lugano Switzerland Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Aix Marseille Univ 13005 Marseille France Simulation Lab Neuroscience Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich Germany Department of Experimental Psychology Ghent University 9000 Ghent Belgium Donders Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University 6525HR Nijmegen The Netherlands Department of Electrical Computer and Energy Engineering University of Colorado Boulder CO 80309 USA Department of Neurosurgery Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21287 USA Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21287 USA Department of Otolaryngology Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21287 USA INSERM U968 Paris France Sorbonne Universités UPMC University Paris 06 UMR_S 968 Institut de la Vision Paris France CNRS UMR_7210 Paris France Department of Computer Architecture and Technology University of Granada (CITIC) Granada Spain Sorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06 INSERM CNRS Institut de la Vision Paris France Department of Adaptive Machine Systems Osaka University Osaka Japan Department of Computer Science University of Cergy-Pontoise Cergy-Pontoise France Department of Physics and Astronomy College of Charleston Charleston SC 29424 USA School of Physics Faculty of Science University of Sydney Sydney NSW 2006 Australia Center of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function Australian Research Council Sydney Australia Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Saxony Lei

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets

引用

Nature methods 2024年第10期21卷 1959页

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection

引用

Nature communications 2023年第1期14卷 436页

作者： Sarthak Pati Ujjwal Baid Brandon Edwards Micah Sheller Shih-Han Wang G Anthony Reina Patrick Foley Alexey Gruzdev Deepthi Karkada Christos Davatzikos Chiharu Sako Satyam Ghodasara Michel Bilello Suyash Mohan Philipp Vollmuth Gianluca Brugnara Chandrakanth J Preetha Felix Sahm Klaus Maier-Hein Maximilian Zenk Martin Bendszus Wolfgang Wick Evan Calabrese Jeffrey Rudie Javier Villanueva-Meyer Soonmee Cha Madhura Ingalhalikar Manali Jadhav Umang Pandey Jitender Saini John Garrett Matthew Larson Robert Jeraj Stuart Currie Russell Frood Kavi Fatania Raymond Y Huang Ken Chang Carmen Balaña Jaume Capellades Josep Puig Johannes Trenkler Josef Pichler Georg Necker Andreas Haunschmidt Stephan Meckel Gaurav Shukla Spencer Liem Gregory S Alexander Joseph Lombardo Joshua D Palmer Adam E Flanders Adam P Dicker Haris I Sair Craig K Jones Archana Venkataraman Meirui Jiang Tiffany Y So Cheng Chen Pheng Ann Heng Qi Dou Michal Kozubek Filip Lux Jan Michálek Petr Matula Miloš Keřkovský Tereza Kopřivová Marek Dostál Václav Vybíhal Michael A Vogelbaum J Ross Mitchell Joaquim Farinhas Joseph A Maldjian Chandan Ganesh Bangalore Yogananda Marco C Pinho Divya Reddy James Holcomb Benjamin C Wagner Benjamin M Ellingson Timothy F Cloughesy Catalina Raymond Talia Oughourlian Akifumi Hagiwara Chencai Wang Minh-Son To Sargam Bhardwaj Chee Chong Marc Agzarian Alexandre Xavier Falcão Samuel B Martins Bernardo C A Teixeira Flávia Sprenger David Menotti Diego R Lucio Pamela LaMontagne Daniel Marcus Benedikt Wiestler Florian Kofler Ivan Ezhov Marie Metz Rajan Jain Matthew Lee Yvonne W Lui Richard McKinley Johannes Slotboom Piotr Radojewski Raphael Meier Roland Wiest Derrick Murcia Eric Fu Rourke Haas John Thompson David Ryan Ormond Chaitra Badve Andrew E Sloan Vachan Vadmal Kristin Waite Rivka R Colen Linmin Pei Murat Ak Ashok Srinivasan J Rajiv Bapuraj Arvind Rao Nicholas Wang Ota Yoshiaki Toshio Moritani Sevcan Turk Joonsang Lee Snehal Prabhudesai Fanny Morón Jacob Mandel Konstantinos Kamnitsas Ben Glocker Luke V M Dixon Matthew Williams Peter Zamp Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA. Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA. Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Munich Bavaria Germany. Intel Corporation Santa Clara CA USA. Department of Neuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany. Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) within the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany. Department of Neuropathology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany. Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany. Pattern Analysis and Learning Group Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany. Neurology Clinic Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany. Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA USA. Symbiosis Center for Medical Image Analysis Symbiosis International University Pune Maharashtra India. Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences Bangalore Karnataka India. Department of Radiology School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin Madison WI USA. Department of Medical Physics School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin Madison WI USA. Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust Department of Radiology Leeds UK. Department of Radiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown MA USA. Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona Spain. Consorci MAR Parc de Salut de Barcelona Catalonia Spain. Department of Radiology (IDI

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：