作者：
A. BielikImage Processing Systems Laboratory
Department of Information Processing Methods Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering Polish Academy of Sciences KRN 55 00-818 Warsaw Poland
Visual interpretation is conjuctured to be of three epistemologically distinct kinds: generalizing, denoting, and naming. Treating the notion of interpretation as epistemologically homogeneous one, what has been a com...
详细信息
Visual interpretation is conjuctured to be of three epistemologically distinct kinds: generalizing, denoting, and naming. Treating the notion of interpretation as epistemologically homogeneous one, what has been a common practice in computer visionsystems up to now, obscures the interpretation problem and leads to false controversies. We survey briefly in this communication the model of representation of interpretation systems. It is an elaborated and augmented version of semantic net formalism. The presentation is biased towards exposing the most essential differences between the kinds of interpretation. Next we show that the epistemological structure of visual interpretation forms in fact a multidimentional staircase-shaped hierarchy of levels, rather than a simple linear hierarchy which has been assumed up to now. The interpretation structure spans over the specialization framework, but the flow of interpretation does not coinside with the specialization direction. It seems that the lack of these features in syntactical models is the fundamental reason they failed to represent perception processes satisfactorily.
暂无评论