检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2023年

作者： Li, Jianning Zhou, Zongwei Yang, Jiancheng Pepe, Antonio Gsaxner, Christina Luijten, Gijs Qu, Chongyu Zhang, Tiezheng Chen, Xiaoxi Li, Wenxuan Wodzinski, Marek Friedrich, Paul Xie, Kangxian Jin, Yuan Ambigapathy, Narmada Nasca, Enrico Solak, Naida Melito, Gian Marco Vu, Viet Duc Memon, Afaque R. Schlachta, Christopher De Ribaupierre, Sandrine Patel, Rajnikant Eagleson, Roy Chen, Xiaojun Mächler, Heinrich Kirschke, Jan Stefan de la Rosa, Ezequiel Christ, Patrick Ferdinand Li, Hongwei Bran Ellis, David G. Aizenberg, Michele R. Gatidis, Sergios Küstner, Thomas Shusharina, Nadya Heller, Nicholas Andrearczyk, Vincent Depeursinge, Adrien Hatt, Mathieu Sekuboyina, Anjany Löffler, Maximilian Liebl, Hans Dorent, Reuben Vercauteren, Tom Shapey, Jonathan Kujawa, Aaron Cornelissen, Stefan Langenhuizen, Patrick Ben-Hamadou, Achraf Rekik, Ahmed Pujades, Sergi Boyer, Edmond Bolelli, Federico Grana, Costantino Lumetti, Luca Salehi, Hamidreza Ma, Jun Zhang, Yao Gharleghi, Ramtin Beier, Susann Sowmya, Arcot Garza-Villarreal, Eduardo A. Balducci, Thania Angeles-Valdez, Diego Souza, Roberto Rittner, Leticia Frayne, Richard Ji, Yuanfeng Ferrari, Vincenzo Chatterjee, Soumick Dubost, Florian Schreiber, Stefanie Mattern, Hendrik Speck, Oliver Haehn, Daniel John, Christoph Nürnberger, Andreas Pedrosa, João Ferreira, Carlos Aresta, Guilherme Cunha, António Campilho, Aurélio Suter, Yannick Garcia, Jose Lalande, Alain Vandenbossche, Vicky Van Oevelen, Aline Duquesne, Kate Mekhzoum, Hamza Vandemeulebroucke, Jef Audenaert, Emmanuel Krebs, Claudia van Leeuwen, Timo Vereecke, Evie Heidemeyer, Hauke Röhrig, Rainer Hölzle, Frank Badeli, Vahid Krieger, Kathrin Gunzer, Matthias Chen, Jianxu van Meegdenburg, Timo Dada, Amin Balzer, Miriam Fragemann, Jana Jonske, Frederic Rempe, Moritz Malorodov, Stanislav Bahnsen, Fin H. Seibold, Constantin Jaus, Alexander Marinov, Zdravko Jaeger, Paul F. Stiefelhagen, Rainer Santos, Ana Sofia Lindo, Mariana Ferreira, André Alves, Victor Kamp, Michael Abourayya, Amr Nensa, Felix Hörst, Fabian Brehmer, Alexander Hein Girardetstraße 2 Essen45131 Germany Graz University of Technology Inffeldgasse 16c Graz8010 Austria Graz Austria The Department of Computer Science Johns Hopkins University Malone Hall 3400 N Charles St BaltimoreMD21218 United States Rte Cantonale Lausanne1015 Switzerland The Department of Measurement and Electronics AGH University of Science and Technology Krakow Poland Sierre Switzerland Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Basel Hegenheimermattweg Allschwil167C CH-4123 Switzerland The Boston College 140 Commonwealth Ave Chestnut HillMA02467 United States University Hospital B7-200 339 Windermere Road LondonN6A 5A5 Canada The Department of Radiology Renji Hospital School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai200240 China The Research Center for Connected Healthcare Big Data ZhejiangLab Zhejiang Hangzhou311121 China The Faculty of Statistics Technical University Dortmund August-Schmidt-Straße 1 Dortmund44227 Germany The Institute of Mechanics Graz University of Technology Kopernikusgasse 24/IV Graz8010 Austria The Institute of Biomedical Manufacturing and Life Quality Engineering State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration School of Mechanical Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University 800 Dongchuan Road Shanghai200240 China The Department of Cardiac Surgery Medical University Graz Auenbruggerplatz 29 Graz8036 Austria The Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Giessen Justus-Liebig-University Giessen Klinikstraße 33 Giessen35392 Germany The Department of Mechanical Engineering Mehran University of Engineering and Technology Jamshoro Sindh76062 Pakistan The Institute of Medical Robotics Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China The Geschäftsführender Oberarzt Abteilung für Interventionelle und Diagnostische Neuroradiologie Universitätsklinikum der Technischen Universität München Ismaningerstr. 22 München81675 Germany icometrix Kolonel Be

Prior to the deep learning era, shape was commonly used to describe the objects. Nowadays, state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms in medical imaging are predominantly diverging from computer vision, where voxel grids, meshes, point clouds, and implicit surface models are used. This is seen from numerous shape-related publications in premier vision conferences as well as the growing popularity of ShapeNet (about 51,300 models) and Princeton ModelNet (127,915 models). For the medical domain, we present a large collection of anatomical shapes (e.g., bones, organs, vessels) and 3D models of surgical instrument, called MedShapeNet, created to facilitate the translation of data-driven vision algorithms to medical applications and to adapt SOTA vision algorithms to medical problems. As a unique feature, we directly model the majority of shapes on the imaging data of real patients. As of today, MedShapeNet includes 23 datasets with more than 100,000 shapes that are paired with annotations (ground truth). Our data is freely accessible via a web interface and a Python application programming interface (API) and can be used for discriminative, reconstructive, and variational benchmarks as well as various applications in virtual, augmented, or mixed reality, and 3D printing. Exemplary, we present use cases in the fields of classification of brain tumors, skull reconstructions, multi-class anatomy completion, education, and 3D printing. In future, we will extend the data and improve the interfaces. The project pages are: https://***/ and https://***/Jianningli/*** Codes 68T01 © 2023, CC BY.

关键词： Large dataset

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The ambiguous world of emotion representation

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Sethu, Vidhyasaharan Provost, Emily Mower Epps, Julien Busso, Carlos Cummins, Nicholas Narayanan, Shrikanth School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications University of New South Wales SydneyNSW2052 Australia Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan Ann ArborMI48109 United States Erik Jonsson School of Engineering & Computer Science University of Texas at Dallas RichardsonTX75080 United States ZD.B Chair of Embedded Intelligence for Health Care Wellbeing University of Augsburg Augsburg Germany Signal Analysis and Interpretation Lab University of Southern California Los AngelesCA90089 United States

Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems have demonstrated huge improvements and human-level parity in a range of activities, including speech recognition, face recognition and speaker verification. However, these diverse tasks share a key commonality that is not true in affective computing: the ground truth information that is inferred can be unambiguously represented. This observation provides some hints as to why affective computing, despite having attracted the attention of researchers for years, may not still be considered a mature field of research. A key reason for this is the lack of a common mathematical framework to describe all the relevant elements of emotion representations. This paper proposes the AMBiguous Emotion Representation (AMBER) framework to address this deficiency. AMBER is a unified framework that explicitly describes categorical, numerical and ordinal representations of emotions, including time varying representations. In addition to explaining the core elements of AMBER, the paper also discusses how some of the commonly employed emotion representation schemes can be viewed through the AMBER framework, and concludes with a discussion of how the proposed framework can be used to reason about current and future affective computing systems. Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Speech recognition

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Mehta, Raghav Filos, Angelos Baid, Ujjwal Sako, Chiharu McKinley, Richard Rebsamen, Michael Dätwyler, Katrin Meier, Raphael Radojewski, Piotr Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan Nalawade, Sahil Ganesh, Chandan Wagner, Ben Yu, Fang F. Fei, Baowei Madhuranthakam, Ananth J. Maldjian, Joseph A. Daza, Laura Gómez, Catalina Arbeláez, Pablo Dai, Chengliang Wang, Shuo Reynaud, Hadrien Mo, Yuanhan Angelini, Elsa Guo, Yike Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Pei, Linmin Murat, A.K. Rosas-González, Sarahi Zemmoura, Ilyess Tauber, Clovis Vu, Minh H. Nyholm, Tufve Löfstedt, Tommy Ballestar, Laura Mora Vilaplana, Veronica McHugh, Hugh Talou, Gonzalo Maso Wang, Alan Patel, Jay Chang, Ken Hoebel, Katharina Gidwani, Mishka Arun, Nishanth Gupta, Sharut Aggarwal, Mehak Singh, Praveer Gerstner, Elizabeth R. Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Boutry, Nicolas Huard, Alexis Vidyaratne, Lasitha Rahman, Md Monibor Iftekharuddin, Khan M. Chazalon, Joseph Puybareau, Elodie Tochon, Guillaume Ma, Jun Cabezas, Mariano Llado, Xavier Oliver, Arnau Valencia, Liliana Valverde, Sergi Amian, Mehdi Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza Myronenko, Andriy Hatamizadeh, Ali Feng, Xue Dou, Quan Tustison, Nicholas Meyer, Craig Shah, Nisarg A. Talbar, Sanjay Weber, Marc-André Mahajan, Abhishek Jakab, Andras Wiest, Roland Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Nazeri, Arash Milchenko, Mikhail Marcus, Daniel Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Colen, Rivka Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Davatzikos, Christos Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Gal, Yarin Arbel, Tal McGill University MontrealQC Canada Group University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine The University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University of Bern Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland Department of Radiology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Department of Bioengineering University of Texas DallasTX United States Advanced Imaging Research Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Colombia Data Science Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom NIHR Imperial BRC ITMAT Data Science Group Imperial College London London United Kingdom Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London United Kingdom Machine Intelligence Unit Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata India Department of CSE University of Calcutta Kolkata India Department of Information Technology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Department of Diagnostic Radiology The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PittsburghPA United States UMR U1253 iBrain Université de Tours Inserm Tours France Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden Department of Computing Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand Radiology Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland New Zealand Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://***/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The association for the advancement of artificial intelligence 2020 workshop program

The association for the advancement of artificial intelligen...

引用

作者： Bang, Grace Barash, Guy Bea, Ryan Cali, Jacques Castillo-Effen, Mauricio Chen, Xin Cynthia Chhaya, Niyati Dhoopar, Rohan Dumancic, Sebastijan Espinoza, Huáscar Farchi, Eitan Fioretto, Ferdinando Fuentetaja, Raquel Galley, Michel Geib, Christopher Hernández-Orallo, José Huang, Xiaowei Keren, Sarah Kim, Seokhwan Jaidka, Kokil Liu, Xiaomo Lu, Tyler Ma, Zhiqiang Mallah, Richard McDermid, John Michalowski, Martin Mirsky, Reuth Héigeartaigh, Seán Ó. Ramachandran, Deepak Segovia-Aguas, Javier Shaban-Nejad, Arash Shehory, Onn Shwartz, Vered Srivastava, Siddharth Talamadupula, Kartik Tang, Jian Zhang, Dell Zhang, Jian S&P Global. Western Digital University of Southampton United Kingdom Blue Prism Group PLC Lockheed Martin's Advanced Technology Laboratories ArlingtonVA United States University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Adobe Research Google Research Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Belgium Commissariat à ĺÉnergie Atomique France IBM Research Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Syracuse University United States Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Spain Microsoft Research AI SIFT LLC Universitat Politècnica de València Spain Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence United Kingdom Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool United Kingdom National University of Singapore Singapore Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences in the of Fields of Multiagent Environment Design and Goal Recognition Design Amazon Alexa AI Future of Life Institute United States University of York Assuring Autonomy International Program United Kingdom University of Minnesota School of Nursing MinneapolisMN United States University of Texas at Austin AustinTX United States Institut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial Spanish Council for Scientific Research Technical University of Catalonia Spain Oak Ridge National Laboratory Center for Biomedical Informatics Department of Pediatrics University of Tennessee Health Science Center United States Bar Ilan University Israel University of Washington SeattleWA United States Autonomous Agents and Intelligent Robots lab of the School of Computing Informatics Decision Systems Arizona State University United States DiDi AI Labs School of Industrial and System Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology United States University of London United Kingdom Microsoft Azure

The Association for the Advancement of Artificial intelligence 2020 Workshop Program included twenty-three workshops covering a wide range of topics in artificial intelligence. This report contains the required reports, which were submitted by most, but not all, of the workshop chairs. Copyright © 2020, Association for the Advancement of Artificial intelligence. All rights reserved.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Medical image imputation from image collections

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2018年

作者： Dalca, Adrian V. Bouman, Katherine L. Freeman, William T. Rost, Natalia S. Sabuncu, Mert R. Golland, Polina Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging General Hospital HMS Massachusetts United States Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab MIT and Google School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering Cornell University Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital HMS United States

We present an algorithm for creating high resolution anatomically plausible images consistent with acquired clinical brain MRI scans with large inter-slice spacing. Although large data sets of clinical images contain a wealth of information, time constraints during acquisition result in sparse scans that fail to capture much of the anatomy. These characteristics often render computational analysis impractical as many image analysis algorithms tend to fail when applied to such images. Highly specialized algorithms that explicitly handle sparse slice spacing do not generalize well across problem domains. In contrast, we aim to enable application of existing algorithms that were originally developed for high resolution research scans to significantly undersampled scans. We introduce a generative model that captures fine-scale anatomical structure across subjects in clinical image collections and derive an algorithm for filling in the missing data in scans with large inter-slice spacing. Our experimental results demonstrate that the resulting method outperforms state-of-the-art upsampling super-resolution techniques, and promises to facilitate subsequent analysis not previously possible with scans of this quality. Our implementation is freely available at https://***/adalca/papago. Copyright © 2018, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Optical resolving power

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Learn2Reg: comprehensive multi-task medical image registration challenge, dataset and evaluation in the era of deep learning

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Hering, Alessa Hansen, Lasse Mok, Tony C.W. Chung, Albert C.S. Siebert, Hanna Häger, Stephanie Lange, Annkristin Kuckertz, Sven Heldmann, Stefan Shao, Wei Vesal, Sulaiman Rusu, Mirabela Sonn, Geoffrey Estienne, Théo Vakalopoulou, Maria Han, Luyi Huang, Yunzhi Yap, Pew-Thian Brudfors, Mikael Balbastre, Yaël Joutard, Samuel Modat, Marc Lifshitz, Gal Raviv, Dan Lv, Jinxin Li, Qiang Jaouen, Vincent Visvikis, Dimitris Fourcade, Constance Rubeaux, Mathieu Pan, Wentao Xu, Zhe Jian, Bailiang De Benetti, Francesca Wodzinski, Marek Gunnarsson, Niklas Sjölund, Jens Grzech, Daniel Qiu, Huaqi Li, Zeju Thorley, Alexander Duan, Jinming Großbröhmer, Christoph Hoopes, Andrew Reinertsen, Ingerid Xiao, Yiming Landman, Bennett Huo, Yuankai Murphy, Keelin Lessmann, Nikolas van Ginneken, Bram Dalca, Adrian V. Heinrich, Mattias P. Institute of Medical Informatics Universität zu Lübeck Ratzeburger Allee 160 Lübeck23562 Germany Fraunhofer MEVIS Institute for Digital Medicine Lübeck23562 Germany Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Radboud University Medical Center GA Nijmegen6525 Netherlands The Institute of Medical Informatics Universität zu Lübeck Lübeck23562 Germany The Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong The Fraunhofer MEVIS Institute for Digital Medicine Lübeck23562 Germany The Department of Radiology Stanford University StanfordCA94305 United States The Department of Urology Stanford University StanfordCA94305 United States The Université Paris-Saclay CentraleSupélec Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes Inria Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette 91190 France Université Paris-Saclay Institut Gustave Roussy Inserm Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique Villejuif94800 France The Université Paris-Saclay CentraleSupélec Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes Inria Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette91190 France The Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen6525 GA Netherlands The School of Automation Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing210044 China The School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United Kingdom The Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital United States Harvard Medical School Boston United States The King’s College London United Kingdom The Tel Aviv University The Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology Hubei Wuhan430074 China MoE Key Laboratory for Biomedical Photonics Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering School of Engineering Sciences Huazhong University of Sci

Image registration is a fundamental medical image analysis task, and a wide variety of approaches have been proposed. However, only a few studies have comprehensively compared medical image registration approaches on a wide range of clinically relevant tasks. This limits the development of registration methods, the adoption of research advances into practice, and a fair benchmark across competing approaches. The Learn2Reg challenge addresses these limitations by providing a multi-task medical image registration data set for comprehensive characterisation of deformable registration algorithms. A continuous evaluation will be possible at https://***. Learn2Reg covers a wide range of anatomies (brain, abdomen, and thorax), modalities (ultrasound, CT, MR), availability of annotations, as well as intra- and inter-patient registration evaluation. We established an easily accessible framework for training and validation of 3D registration methods, which enabled the compilation of results of over 65 individual method submissions from more than 20 unique teams. We used a complementary set of metrics, including robustness, accuracy, plausibility, and runtime, enabling unique insight into the current state-of-the-art of medical image registration. This paper describes datasets, tasks, evaluation methods and results of the challenge, as well as results of further analysis of transferability to new datasets, the importance of label supervision, and resulting bias. While no single approach worked best across all tasks, many methodological aspects could be identified that push the performance of medical image registration to new state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, we demystified the common belief that conventional registration methods have to be much slower than deep-learning-based methods. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Image registration

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) Challenge: Establishing Correspondence Between Pre-Operative and Follow-up MRI Scans of Diffuse Glioma Patients

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Baheti, Bhakti Chakrabarty, Satrajit Akbari, Hamed Bilello, Michel Wiestler, Benedikt Schwarting, Julian Calabrese, Evan Rudie, Jeffrey Abidi, Syed Mousa, Mina Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Fields, Brandon K.K. Kofler, Florian Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Mok, Tony C.W. Chung, Albert C.S. Wodzinski, Marek Jurgas, Artur Marini, Niccolò Atzori, Manfredo Müller, Henning Grosbröhmer, Christoph Siebert, Hanna Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias P. Canalini, Luca Klein, Jan Gerken, Annika Heldmann, Stefan Hering, Alessa Hahn, Horst K. Meng, Mingyuan Bi, Lei Feng, Dagan Kim, Jinman Zeineldinal, Ramy A. Karar, Mohamed E. Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska Burgert, Oliver Abderezaei, Javid Pionteck, Aymeric Chopra, Agamdeep Kurt, Mehmet Yan, Kewei Yan, Yonghong Tang, Zhe Ma, Jianqiang Nasser, Sahar Almahfouz Kurian, Nikhil Cherian Meena, Mohit Shamsi, Saqib Sethi, Amit Tustison, Nicholas J. Avants, Brian B. Cook, Philip Gee, James C. Tian, Lin Greer, Hastings Niethammer, Marc Hoopesar, Andrew Hoffmannas, Malte Dalcaar, Adrian V. Christodoulidis, Stergios Estiene, Théo Vakalopoulou, Maria Paragios, Nikos Marcus, Daniel S. Davatzikos, Christos Sotiras, Aristeidis Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Waldmannstetter, Diana Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering Washington University in St. Louis St. LouisMO United States GE HealthCare San RamonCA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. LouisMO United States Institute for Informatics Data Science & Biostatistics Washington University School of Medicine St. LouisMO United States Department of Bioengineering Santa Clara University Santa ClaraCA United States Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Computer Science TUM School of Computation Information and Technology Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology School of Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging University of California San FranciscoCA United States Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Radiology University of California San DiegoCA United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Neuherberg Germany Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center Department of Biostatistics Epidemiology and Informatics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School United States Centre for Medical Imaging Computing University College London United Kingdom The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong University of Applied Sciences West

Registration of longitudinal brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans containing pathologies is challenging due to dramatic changes in tissue appearance. Although there has been considerable progress in developing general-purpose medical image registration techniques, they have not yet attained the requisite precision and reliability for this task, highlighting its inherent complexity. Here we describe the Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) challenge, as the first public benchmark environment for deformable registration algorithms focusing on estimating correspondences between pre-operative and follow-up scans of the same patient diagnosed with a diffuse brain glioma. The challenge was conducted in conjunction with both the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2022 and the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2022. The BraTS-Reg data comprise de-identified multi-institutional multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scans, curated for size and resolution according to a canonical anatomical template, and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Clinical experts annotated ground truth (GT) landmark points of anatomical locations distinct across the temporal domain. The training data with their GT annotations, were publicly released to enable the development of registration algorithms. The validation data, without their GT annotations, were also released to allow for algorithmic evaluation prior to the testing phase, which only allowed submission of containerized algorithms for evaluation on hidden hold-out testing data. Quantitative evaluation and ranking was based on the Median Euclidean Error (MEE), Robustness, and the determinant of the Jacobian of the displacement field. The top-ranked methodologies yielded similar performance across all evaluation metrics and shared several methodological commonalities, including pre-alignment, deep neural networks, inverse consistency

关键词： Magnetic resonance imaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Reinke, Annika Tizabi, Minu D. Sudre, Carole H. Eisenmann, Matthias Rädsch, Tim Baumgartner, Michael Acion, Laura Antonelli, Michela Arbel, Tal Bakas, Spyridon Bankhead, Peter Benis, Arriel Blaschko, Matthew Buettner, Florian Cardoso, M. Jorge Chen, Jianxu Cheplygina, Veronika Christodoulou, Evangelia Cimini, Beth A. Collins, Gary S. Engelhardt, Sandy Farahani, Keyvan Ferrer, Luciana Galdran, Adrian van Ginneken, Bram Glocker, Ben Godau, Patrick Haase, Robert Hamprecht, Fred Hashimoto, Daniel A. Heckmann-Nötzel, Doreen Hirsch, Peter Hoffman, Michael M. Huisman, Merel Isensee, Fabian Jannin, Pierre Kahn, Charles E. Kainmueller, Dagmar Kainz, Bernhard Karargyris, Alexandros Karthikesalingam, Alan Kavur, A. Emre Kenngott, Hannes Kleesiek, Jens Kleppe, Andreas Koehler, Sven Kofler, Florian Kopp-Schneider, Annette Kooi, Thijs Kozubek, Michal Kreshuk, Anna Kurc, Tahsin Landman, Bennett A. Litjens, Geert Madani, Amin Maier-Hein, Klaus Martel, Anne L. Mattson, Peter Meijering, Erik Menze, Bjoern Moher, David Moons, Karel G.M. Müller, Henning Nichyporuk, Brennan Nickel, Felix Noyan, M. Alican Petersen, Jens Polat, Gorkem Rafelski, Susanne M. Rajpoot, Nasir Reyes, Mauricio Rieke, Nicola Riegler, Michael A. Rivaz, Hassan Saez-Rodriguez, Julio Sánchez, Clara I. Schroeter, Julien Saha, Anindo Selver, M. Alper Sharan, Lalith Shetty, Shravya Smeden, Maarten V.A.N. Stieltjes, Bram Summers, Ronald M. Taha, Abdel A. Tiulpin, Aleksei Tsaftaris, Sotirios A. Calster, Ben V.A.N. Varoquaux, Gaël Wiesenfarth, Manuel Yaniv, Ziv R. Jäger, Paul Maier-Hein, Lena Division of Intelligent Medical Systems and HI Helmholtz Imaging Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Medical Center Heidelberg Germany MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing Department of Computer Science University College London London United Kingdom School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science King’s College London London United Kingdom Division of Medical Image Computing Heidelberg Germany Instituto de Cálculo CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom McGill University Montréal Canada Division of Computational Pathology Dept of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IU Health Information and Translational Sciences Building Indianapolis United States University of Pennsylvania Richards Medical Research Laboratories FL7 PhiladelphiaPA United States Institute of Genetics and Cancer University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom Department of Digital Medical Technologies Holon Institute of Technology Holon Israel European Federation for Medical Informatics Le Mont-sur-Lausanne Switzerland Center for Processing Speech and Images Department of Electrical Engineering KU Leuven Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - box 2441 Leuven3001 Belgium Frankfurt/Mainz DKFZ UCT Frankfurt-Marburg Germany Heidelberg Germany Goethe University Frankfurt Department of Medicine Germany Goethe University Frankfurt Department of Informatics Germany Frankfurt Cancer Insititute Germany Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften – ISAS – e.V. Dortmund Germany Department of Computer Science IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Imaging Platform Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard CambridgeMA United States Centre for St

While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using specific metrics for a given image analysis task. These are typically related to (1) the disregard of inherent metric properties, such as the behaviour in the presence of class imbalance or small target structures, (2) the disregard of inherent data set properties, such as the non-independence of the test cases, and (3) the disregard of the actual biomedical domain interest that the metrics should reflect. This living dynamically document has the purpose to illustrate important limitations of performance metrics commonly applied in the field of image analysis. In this context, it focuses on biomedical image analysis problems that can be phrased as image-level classification, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or object detection task. The current version is based on a Delphi process on metrics conducted by an international consortium of image analysis experts from more than 60 institutions worldwide. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Medical imaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets

引用

Nature methods 2024年第10期21卷 1959页

作者： Linus Manubens-Gil Zhi Zhou Hanbo Chen Arvind Ramanathan Xiaoxiao Liu Yufeng Liu Alessandro Bria Todd Gillette Zongcai Ruan Jian Yang Miroslav Radojević Ting Zhao Li Cheng Lei Qu Siqi Liu Kristofer E Bouchard Lin Gu Weidong Cai Shuiwang Ji Badrinath Roysam Ching-Wei Wang Hongchuan Yu Amos Sironi Daniel Maxim Iascone Jie Zhou Erhan Bas Eduardo Conde-Sousa Paulo Aguiar Xiang Li Yujie Li Sumit Nanda Yuan Wang Leila Muresan Pascal Fua Bing Ye Hai-Yan He Jochen F Staiger Manuel Peter Daniel N Cox Michel Simonneau Marcel Oberlaender Gregory Jefferis Kei Ito Paloma Gonzalez-Bellido Jinhyun Kim Edwin Rubel Hollis T Cline Hongkui Zeng Aljoscha Nern Ann-Shyn Chiang Jianhua Yao Jane Roskams Rick Livesey Janine Stevens Tianming Liu Chinh Dang Yike Guo Ning Zhong Georgia Tourassi Sean Hill Michael Hawrylycz Christof Koch Erik Meijering Giorgio A Ascoli Hanchuan Peng Institute for Brain and Intelligence Southeast University Nanjing China. Microsoft Corporation Redmond WA USA. Tencent AI Lab Bellevue WA USA. Computing Environment and Life Sciences Directorate Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USA. Kaya Medical Seattle WA USA. University of Cassino and Southern Lazio Cassino Italy. Center for Neural Informatics Structures and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study George Mason University Fairfax VA USA. Faculty of Information Technology Beijing University of Technology Beijing China. Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services Beijing China. Nuctech Netherlands Rotterdam the Netherlands. Janelia Research Campus Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ashburn VA USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computation and Signal Processing Anhui University Hefei China. Paige AI New York NY USA. Scientific Data Division and Biological Systems and Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Berkeley CA USA. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience UC Berkeley Berkeley CA USA. RIKEN AIP Tokyo Japan. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST) The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan. School of Computer Science University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia. Texas A&M University College Station TX USA. Cullen College of Engineering University of Houston Houston TX USA. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Taipei Taiwan. National Centre for Computer Animation Bournemouth University Poole UK. PROPHESEE Paris France. Department of Neuroscience Columbia University New York NY USA. Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute Columbia University New York NY USA. Department of Computer Science Northern Illinois Universit

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：